Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

N.Raveendran vs State of Kerala

N.Raveendran vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1337362

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/4711/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N.Raveendran

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....reliefs: “i) declare that the petitioner is eligible for the benefit of exhibit p3 order. ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider exhibit p5 request in the light of exhibit p3 and regularise the service of thepetitioner.” having considered the contentions advanced on all side, there will be a direction that in case the petitioner submits a proper comprehensive representation before the 1st respondent, pointing out his grievances and seeking redressal, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the same shall be considered with notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 2 and 3. appropriate orders shall be passed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- anu sivaraman judge ssk/28/02 appendix petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of note submitted by the 3rd respondent dated 31.12.2010 informing petitioner's employment as door keeper. exhibit p2 :- true copy of the recent voucher and receipt of payment given to the petitioner dated 9.1.2022 exhibit p3 :- true copy of order no.29/06/e1/ksfdc dated 16.11.2015 issued by the 2nd respondent. exhibit p4 true copy of representation dated 6.12.2018 submitted by the petitioner before the hon'ble minister for cultural affairs, government of kerala exhibit p5 true copy of representation dated 14.01.2021 submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. ssk //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 4711 OF 2022 PETITIONER: N.RAVEENDRAN AGED 52 YEARS N. RAVEENDRAN, S/O. NARAYANAN, AGED 52 YEARS, NAMBRATHVEEDU, THALI (PO), KADUKASSERY, THRISSUR - 680585., PIN - 680585 BY ADV D.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001., PIN - 695032 2 KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695032 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,, PIN - 695032 3 MANAGER MANAGER, KAIRALI SREE THEATRES, VADAKKE STAND, THRISSUR - 680020., PIN - 680020 BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.JOSE JONES JOSEPH, SC, KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD. A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN (SR.) SHILPA SATHISH APARNA NAIR JOSE JONES JOSEPH

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of February, 2023

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: “i) Declare that the petitioner is eligible for the benefit of Exhibit P3 order. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P5 request in the light of Exhibit P3 and regularise the service of the

petitioner.” Having considered the contentions advanced on all side, there will be a direction that in case the petitioner submits a proper comprehensive representation before the 1st respondent, pointing out his grievances and seeking redressal, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, the same shall be considered with notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 2 and 3. Appropriate orders shall be passed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SSK/28/02 APPENDIX PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 31.12.2010 INFORMING PETITIONER'S EMPLOYMENT AS DOOR KEEPER. EXHIBIT P2 :- TRUE COPY OF THE RECENT VOUCHER AND RECEIPT OF PAYMENT GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER DATED 9.1.2022 EXHIBIT P3 :- TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.29/06/E1/KSFDC DATED 16.11.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 6.12.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE MINISTER FOR CULTURAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 14.01.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties N.Raveendran vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales