Jain Jacob vs the Tahsildar

Jain Jacob vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 08, 2023

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1336845

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1336845
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
Decided On: Feb 08, 2023
Case Number: WP(C)/4020/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jain Jacob

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....nath (sr gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 08.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 4020 of 2023 2judgmentpetitioner has approached this court, seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider ext.p3 the application made by the petitioner for effecting mutation, in accordance with law.2. learned senior government pleader would submit thatthe application can be directed to be considered by the 1 st respondent. taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioner seeks only limited relief and also considering the fact that ext.p3 appears to have been submitted as early as in the month of february, 2022, the writ petition will stand disposed of, directing the 1 st respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p3 application made by the petitioner for mutation, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. on consideration of the matter, if the 1st respondent feels that there are other parties also to be heard, he shall ensure that the orders effecting mutation are issued only after hearing all the affected parties, including the petitioner. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- gopinath p., judge ajt wp(c) no. 4020 of 2023 3 appendix of wp(c) 4020/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the partition deed dated 31.07.1996 registered as document no. exhibit p2 true copy of the partition deed dated 14.03.1996 registered as document no.1629/1996 of puthencruz sub registry exhibit p3 true copy of the application for mutation dated 25.02.2022 submitted before the 3rd respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 19TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 4020 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: JAIN JACOB, AGED 46 YEARS S/O JACOB KOCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE, KUZHOOR, AIRAPURAM, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683541 BY ADVS. P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN K.R.PRATHISH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE TAHSILDAR 2 THE TALUK SURVEYOR 3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER AIRAPURAM VILLAGE OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683541 SRI. BIMAL K NATH (SR GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 4020 OF 2023 2

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court, seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P3 the application made by the petitioner for effecting mutation, in accordance with law.

2. Learned Senior Government Pleader would submit that

the application can be directed to be considered by the 1 st respondent. Taking into consideration of the fact that the petitioner seeks only limited relief and also considering the fact that Ext.P3 appears to have been submitted as early as in the month of February, 2022, the writ petition will stand disposed of, directing the 1 st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner for mutation, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. On consideration of the matter, if the 1st respondent feels that there are other parties also to be heard, he shall ensure that the orders effecting mutation are issued only after hearing all the affected parties, including the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- GOPINATH P., JUDGE ajt WP(C) NO. 4020 OF 2023 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4020/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED DATED 31.07.1996 REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED DATED 14.03.1996 REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO.1629/1996 OF PUTHENCRUZ SUB REGISTRY Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR MUTATION DATED 25.02.2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Jain Jacob vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.