Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vidhya V. vs Abhilash

Vidhya V. vs Abhilash

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 20, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1336713

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/103/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vidhya V.

Respondent

Abhilash

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice amit rawal & the honourable mrs. justice c.s. sudha wednesday, the 20th day of december 2023 / 29th agrahayana, op (fc) no. 103 of 2021 against the order dated 12/11/2020 in i.a.no.2364 of 2019 in op 990/2019 on files of family court, mavelikkara petitioner/petitioner/petitioner: vidhya v. aged 25 years, d/o. valsala veena, bhavanam, peringala village, koippallykarazhma muri, maelikara taluk, alappuzha 690 537. by advs. george mathew sri.m.d.sasikumaran shri.praveen s. shri.sunil kumar a.g sri.dipu james shri.mathew k.t. shri.george k.v.respondents/respondents/respondents: 1 abhilash, aged 39 years, s/o. sadasivan, abhilash, bhavanam, 2 sadasivan, aged 66 years f/o. abhilash, abhilash bhavanam, kuttemperoor muri, mannar village, 3 rajamma, aged 61 years m/o. abhilash, abhilash bhavanam, 4 anitha, aged 37 years s/o. abhilsh, abhilash bhavanam, by adv sri.k.rajesh kannan this op (family court) having come up for admission on 20.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: amit rawal & c.s.sudha, jj. ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- dated this the 20th day of december, 2023judgmentamit rawal, j.today when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the liberty of this court to withdraw the appeal. hence the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. . sd/- amit rawal sd/- c.s.sudha jms appendix of op (fc) 103/2021 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of petition dtd. 17.08.2019 in i.a. no. 2364 of 2019 in o.p. no. 990 of 2019 of the family court, exhibit p2 true copy of order dtd. 12.11.2020in i.a. no. 2364 of 2019 in o.p. no. 990 of 2019 of the family court,

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA, OP (FC) NO. 103 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12/11/2020 IN I.A.NO.2364 OF 2019 IN OP 990/2019 ON FILES OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER: VIDHYA V. AGED 25 YEARS, D/O. VALSALA VEENA, BHAVANAM, PERINGALA VILLAGE, KOIPPALLYKARAZHMA MURI, MAELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA 690 537. BY ADVS. GEORGE MATHEW SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN SHRI.PRAVEEN S. SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI.DIPU JAMES SHRI.MATHEW K.T. SHRI.GEORGE K.V.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 ABHILASH, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O. SADASIVAN, ABHILASH, BHAVANAM, 2 SADASIVAN, AGED 66 YEARS F/O. ABHILASH, ABHILASH BHAVANAM, KUTTEMPEROOR MURI, MANNAR VILLAGE, 3 RAJAMMA, AGED 61 YEARS M/O. ABHILASH, ABHILASH BHAVANAM, 4 ANITHA, AGED 37 YEARS S/O. ABHILSH, ABHILASH BHAVANAM, BY ADV SRI.K.RAJESH KANNAN THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AMIT RAWAL & C.S.SUDHA, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2023

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

Today when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the liberty of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. . Sd/- AMIT RAWAL Sd/- C.S.SUDHA Jms APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 103/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DTD. 17.08.2019 IN I.A. NO. 2364 OF 2019 IN O.P. NO. 990 OF 2019 OF THE FAMILY COURT, EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DTD. 12.11.2020IN I.A. NO. 2364 OF 2019 IN O.P. NO. 990 OF 2019 OF THE FAMILY COURT,

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial