Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Latha. M vs State of Kerala

Latha. M vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 27, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1335544

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1366/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Latha. M

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen wednesday, the 27th day of september 2023/5th aswina, 1945 crime no.223/2019 of kottayi police station petitioner/accused: latha. m aged 40 years w/o.sajeev karun, karuna nivas, venganallur p.o., chelakkara. thrissur, pin - 680586 by adv renjith b.marar respondent/state: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala ernakulam, pin - 682031 sri.k denny devassy, sr.public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 27.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderth dated this the 27 day of september, 2023 this is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure by the accused in crime no.223/2019 of kottayi police station, where the accused alleged to have committed offences punishable under sections 406, 420 and 506 of ipc, sections 3 and 4 of the kerala prevention of money laundering act, 2002 and sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning) act, 1978.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned public prosecutor.3. at the time of hearing, the learned public prosecutorsubmitted that in this case, investigation has been completed and final report filed. recording the submission, this anticipatory bail application stands closed, with liberty to the petitioner to move for regular bail before the jurisdictional court, in accordance with law. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023/5TH ASWINA, 1945 CRIME NO.223/2019 OF KOTTAYI POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: LATHA. M AGED 40 YEARS W/O.SAJEEV KARUN, KARUNA NIVAS, VENGANALLUR P.O., CHELAKKARA. THRISSUR, PIN - 680586 BY ADV RENJITH B.MARAR RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 SRI.K DENNY DEVASSY, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

th Dated this the 27 day of September, 2023 This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the accused in crime No.223/2019 of Kottayi police station, where the accused alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Kerala Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. At the time of hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that in this case, investigation has been completed and final report filed. Recording the submission, this anticipatory bail application stands closed, with liberty to the petitioner to move for regular bail before the jurisdictional court, in accordance with law. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial