Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

John P. Alencherry vs Joseph John

John P. Alencherry vs Joseph John

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 28, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1335017

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/236/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

John P. Alencherry

Respondent

Joseph John

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 28th day of february 2023 / 9th phalguna, 1944 posting for trial of os 6/2015 ofsub court, kottayam petitioner/s:john p. alencherry,aged 61 years s/o augustine philipose, alenchery house, vazhapally west village, thuruthikara, changanacherry taluk, kottayam district - 686103, represented by his power of attorney, philipose p. alencherry, aged 59 years, s/o augustine philipose, alencherry house, vazhapally west village, thuruthikara, changanacherry taluk, kottayam district -, pin - 686103 by advs. k.shaj beena n.kartha c.ijlal reshma.p. arun chand joseph mary das vinayak g menon bharat vijay p. majid muhammed k. minu vittorria paulsonrespondent/s: joseph john aged 65 years s/o joseph, thoppil house, perunna west, changanacherry taluk, kottayam district -, pin - this op (civil) having come up for admission on 28.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:c.s dias,j.--------------------------- ----------------------------- dated this the 28th day of february, 2023.judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject-matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of court. the said submission is recorded. the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- sks/28.2.2023 c.s.dias, judge appendix of op(c) 236/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the power of attorney dated 18/06/2013 executed by the petitioner exhibit p2 the true copy of the plaint in o.s. no. kottayam exhibit p3 the true copy of the written statement in o.s. no. 6/2015 on the file of the sub court, kottayam exhibit p4 the true copy of the i.a. no. 4/2023 ino.s. no. 6/2015 filed by the petitioner for ad-journment of the case, before the sub court, kottayam exhibit p5 the true copy of the printout of the proceed-ings obtained from the website in exhibit p4 ia in o.s. no. 6/2015 before the sub court, kottayam

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1944 POSTING FOR TRIAL OF OS 6/2015 OFSUB COURT, KOTTAYAM PETITIONER/S:

JOHN P. ALENCHERRY,AGED 61 YEARS S/O AUGUSTINE PHILIPOSE, ALENCHERY HOUSE, VAZHAPALLY WEST VILLAGE, THURUTHIKARA, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686103, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, PHILIPOSE P. ALENCHERRY, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O AUGUSTINE PHILIPOSE, ALENCHERRY HOUSE, VAZHAPALLY WEST VILLAGE, THURUTHIKARA, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT -, PIN - 686103 BY ADVS. K.SHAJ BEENA N.KARTHA C.IJLAL RESHMA.P. ARUN CHAND JOSEPH MARY DAS VINAYAK G MENON BHARAT VIJAY P. MAJID MUHAMMED K. MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON

RESPONDENT/S: JOSEPH JOHN AGED 65 YEARS S/O JOSEPH, THOPPIL HOUSE, PERUNNA WEST, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT -, PIN - THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S DIAS,J.

--------------------------- ----------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of February, 2023.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject-matter in dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court. The said submission is recorded. The original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- sks/28.2.2023 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE APPENDIX OF OP(C) 236/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED 18/06/2013 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO. KOTTAYAM Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN O.S. NO. 6/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 4/2023 IN

O.S. NO. 6/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR AD-JOURNMENT OF THE CASE, BEFORE THE SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PRINTOUT OF THE PROCEED-INGS OBTAINED FROM THE WEBSITE IN EXHIBIT P4 IA IN O.S. NO. 6/2015 BEFORE THE SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial