Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunil Thomas, vs the State of Kerala,

Sunil Thomas, vs The State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 21, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1334763

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/2598/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Thomas,

Respondent

The State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh monday, the 21st day of august 2023 / 30th sravana, 1945 wp(c) no. 2598 of 2019 petitioner: sunil thomas, aged 50 years s/o.p.t.thomas, residing at peedikaparambil house, vadakkancherry, palakkad. by advs. v.s.chandrasekharan sri.m.v.das smt.lekshmi swaminathan sri.s.jayakumar respondents:1 the state of kerala, represented by the secretary, department of transport, state secretariat, thiruvananthapuram- 695001. 2 the sub regional transport officer, sub rt office, alathur, palakkad district- 678001. 3 the deputy tahsildar, alathur taluk, palakkad district- 678001. 4 s.a.abdul jabbar, s/o.sayeed mohammed, farsana manzil, anugraha colony, vennakkara, noorani p.o, palakkad- 678004. this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on21.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 21st day of august, 20231. none appears to press this writ petition during the revised call.2. hence, this writ petition is dismissed fornon-prosecution. interim order, if any, stands vacated. sd/- dinesh kumar singh judge ap appendix of wp(c) 2598/2019 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the memo issued to the petitioner by the 2nd respondent dated 12.04.2012. exhibit p2 true copy of communication issued by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent dated 29.01.2013. exhibit p3 true copy of the notice dated 23.07.2018 of the 2nd respondent. exhibit p4 true copy of the communication addressed by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent dated 29.07.2018. exhibit p5 true copy of the notice issued to the petitioner under section 7 of the revenue recovery act dated 04.12.2018. exhibit p6 true copy of the notice issued to the petitioner under section 34 of the revenue recovery act. exhibit p7 true copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent dated 07.01.2019.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 30TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 2598 OF 2019 PETITIONER: SUNIL THOMAS, AGED 50 YEARS S/O.P.T.THOMAS, RESIDING AT PEEDIKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADAKKANCHERRY, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS. V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN SRI.M.V.DAS SMT.LEKSHMI SWAMINATHAN SRI.S.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001. 2 THE SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, SUB RT OFFICE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 678001. 3 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 678001. 4 S.A.ABDUL JABBAR, S/O.SAYEED MOHAMMED, FARSANA MANZIL, ANUGRAHA COLONY, VENNAKKARA, NOORANI P.O, PALAKKAD- 678004. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

21.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of August, 2023

1. None appears to press this writ petition during the revised call.

2. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for

non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE AP APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2598/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.04.2012. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.01.2013. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 23.07.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.07.2018. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT DATED 04.12.2018. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 07.01.2019.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial