Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sugathan vs Sivadasan

Sugathan vs Sivadasan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 10, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1334412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/96/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sugathan

Respondent

Sivadasan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice t.r.ravi thursday, the 10th day of august 2023 / 19th sravana, 1945against the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2019 in as 34/2015 of additional district court- iii, mavelikkara and the against the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2014 in os 52/2011 of munsiff court, haripad appellants/appellants/defendants: 1 sugathan aged 53 years 2 sushama, aged 47 years w/o.sugathan, mullasseril vadakkethil, respondents/respondents/plaintiffs: 1 sivadasan aged 39 years 2 deepa,. aged 31 years w/o.sivadasan, mullasseril vadakkethil, by advs. sri.p.r.harikumar sri.ananthu s. hari this regular second appeal having come up for hearing on 10.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: t. ,j. rsa no. 96 of2020 dat ed t hi sthe10th dayofaugust ,2023 j udgm ent the counself ort he appel ssubmi tst hatshe has r eli nqui shed vakal at and t hat t he par ties have not r esponded even af teri ssuance ofr egi ster ed not ices.i tis seen t hateven when t he mat terwassentf ormedi ati on, t heappel sdi dnott urnup. the second appeal i s hence di smi ssed f or non pr osecut ion. sd/ - t. j udge sn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1945

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.12.2019 IN AS 34/2015 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT- III, MAVELIKKARA AND THE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.01.2014 IN OS 52/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, HARIPAD APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 SUGATHAN AGED 53 YEARS 2 SUSHAMA, AGED 47 YEARS W/O.SUGATHAN, MULLASSERIL VADAKKETHIL, RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 SIVADASAN AGED 39 YEARS 2 DEEPA,. AGED 31 YEARS W/O.SIVADASAN, MULLASSERIL VADAKKETHIL, BY ADVS. SRI.P.R.HARIKUMAR SRI.ANANTHU S. HARI THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 10.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T. ,J. RSA No. 96 of2020 Dat ed t hi sthe10th dayofAugust ,2023 J UDGM ENT The counself ort he appel ssubmi tst hatshe has r eli nqui shed vakal at and t hat t he par ties have not r esponded even af teri ssuance ofr egi ster ed not ices.I tis seen t hateven when t he mat terwassentf ormedi ati on, t heappel sdi dnott urnup. The second appeal i s hence di smi ssed f or non pr osecut ion. Sd/ - T. J UDGE sn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial