Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.C. Rathi Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

P.C. Rathi vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Apr 28, 1998
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/13338

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.C. Rathi

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In
(1999)(112)ELT815TriDel

Excerpt

1. the order impugned in the appeals giving rise to the stay applications is under challenge in appeal no. e/48/98-a, being the main appeal filed by the assessee. in that appeal we waived the requirement of pre-deposit of the amount of duty confirmed and penalty imposed.applicants before us are directors of the assessee. in the circumstances, following the earlier order, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of the amounts of penalty imposed on the applicants herein.the applications are allowed.

Full Judgment

1. The order impugned in the appeals giving rise to the stay applications is under challenge in Appeal No. E/48/98-A, being the main appeal filed by the assessee. In that appeal we waived the requirement of pre-deposit of the amount of duty confirmed and penalty imposed.

Applicants before us are Directors of the assessee. In the circumstances, following the earlier order, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of the amounts of penalty imposed on the applicants herein.

The applications are allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial