Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Adeep vs State of Kerala

ADEEP vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1333773

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./657/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ADEEP

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. saturday, the 30th day of september 2023 / 8th aswina, 1945 bail appl. no. 657 of 2022 crime no.47/2022 of muvattupuzha police station, ernakulam petitioner: adeep aged 29 years, valiyathukudy house, pezhakkapillyp.o., mulavoor village, pezhakkappilly kara, muvattupuzha taluk, ernakulam district - 686 673., t.a.unnikrishnan k.k.akhil respondents: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, ernakulam, pin - 682031 *addl.r2 surayya jalal w/o adeep, now residing at melethadam veedu pallipram kara, perumbavoor village, kunnathunadu taluk, ernakulam districtsuo motu impleaded as additional r2 as per orderdated 15/2/2022. public prosecutor tony george thomas geevan t.charles(k/001411/2021) noushad k.a - pp this bail application having come up for admission on 30.09.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ba no.657 of 2022 .. 2 ..orderdated this the 30th day of september, 2023 this is an application for anticipatory bail was filed in crime no.47/2022 of muvattupuzha police station, ernakulam.2. when this matter is taken up for consideration today,the learned public prosecutor submits that the prosecution does not seek the custody of the petitioner for the purpose of the investigation, as the investigation has been completed and the final report has been filed before the court. taking into consideration the afore submission of the learned public prosecutor, the bail application is closed making it clear that the petitioner shall appear on summons from the jurisdictional court and shall obtain bail from that court. sd/- gopinath p. judge ded

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 8TH ASWINA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 657 OF 2022 CRIME NO.47/2022 OF MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER: ADEEP AGED 29 YEARS, VALIYATHUKUDY HOUSE, PEZHAKKAPILLYP.O., MULAVOOR VILLAGE, PEZHAKKAPPILLY KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 686 673., T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN K.K.AKHIL RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 *ADDL.R2 SURAYYA JALAL W/O ADEEP, NOW RESIDING AT MELETHADAM VEEDU PALLIPRAM KARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL R2 AS PER ORDER

DATED 15/2/2022. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR TONY GEORGE THOMAS GEEVAN T.CHARLES(K/001411/2021) NOUSHAD K.A - PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BA No.657 of 2022 .. 2 ..

ORDER

Dated this the 30th day of September, 2023 This is an application for anticipatory bail was filed in Crime No.47/2022 of Muvattupuzha Police Station, Ernakulam.

2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today,

the learned Public Prosecutor submits that the prosecution does not seek the custody of the petitioner for the purpose of the investigation, as the investigation has been completed and the final report has been filed before the Court. Taking into consideration the afore submission of the learned Public Prosecutor, the bail application is closed making it clear that the petitioner shall appear on summons from the jurisdictional court and shall obtain bail from that Court. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ded

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial