Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K V Narayanan vs M V Chandran

K V Narayanan vs M V Chandran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 10, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1333655

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AR/16/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K V Narayanan

Respondent

M V Chandran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran monday, the 10th day of april 2023 / 20th chaithra, 1945 petitioner: sri.k v narayanan s/o t.appu nair aged 70 years kavile veetil, kozhummal p o, payyannur kannur district, pin - 670521 by advs. pramod m. shyju c.t sagith kumar v. santhosh kumar g.s. respondents: sri.m v chandran managing partner vinayaka enterprises old village office near sreeprabha road payyannur p o kannur, pin - 670307 by adv r surendran this arbitration request having come up for admission on 10.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentsri.m.pramod - learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this arbitration request with liberty being reserved to his client to file a fresh one. in the afore circumstances, this arbitration request is dismissed with liberty being reserved to the petitioner, however subject to the rules of limitation as applicable. sd/- devan ramachandran, judge lsn appendix of ar 16/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the partnership deed dated15-07-2013 exhibit p2 true copy of the partnership deed dated 19-08-2013 exhibit p3 discharge summery of kmc hospital exhibit p4 true copy of the lease agreement dated 01.04.2020exhibit p5 true copy of the letter exhibit p6 true copy of the letter exhibit p7 true copy of the letter exhibit p8 true copy of the bank statement exhibit p9 a true copy of the notice dated 22-09-2022 issued by the petitioner invoking arbitration along with postal receipt exhibit p10 true copy of the notice dated 17-10- 2022 issued by the respondent respondent exhibits exhibit r1(b) a true copy of the partnership deed dated 1-4-2020 executed between m.v.chandran and others exhibit r1(a) a true copy of the print out of the email dated 31-3-2020 received by respondent from the petitioner respondents exhibits: nil true copy p.a to judge lsn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1945 PETITIONER: SRI.K V NARAYANAN S/O T.APPU NAIR AGED 70 YEARS KAVILE VEETIL, KOZHUMMAL P O, PAYYANNUR KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670521 BY ADVS. PRAMOD M. SHYJU C.T SAGITH KUMAR V. SANTHOSH KUMAR G.S. RESPONDENTS: SRI.M V CHANDRAN MANAGING PARTNER VINAYAKA ENTERPRISES OLD VILLAGE OFFICE NEAR SREEPRABHA ROAD PAYYANNUR P O KANNUR, PIN - 670307 BY ADV R SURENDRAN THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Sri.M.Pramod - learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this Arbitration Request with liberty being reserved to his client to file a fresh one. In the afore circumstances, this Arbitration Request is dismissed with liberty being reserved to the petitioner, however subject to the Rules of Limitation as applicable. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE lsn APPENDIX OF AR 16/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED15-07-2013 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED 19-08-2013 Exhibit P3 DISCHARGE SUMMERY OF KMC HOSPITAL Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 01.04.2020

Exhibit P5          TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER
Exhibit P6          TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER
Exhibit P7          TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER
Exhibit P8          TRUE COPY OF THE BANK STATEMENT
Exhibit P9          A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22-09-

2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER INVOKING ARBITRATION ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17-10- 2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(b) A true copy of the partnership deed dated 1-4-2020 executed between M.V.Chandran and others Exhibit R1(a) A true copy of the print out of the email dated 31-3-2020 received by Respondent from the petitioner RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE LSN

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial