Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajeev vs State of Kerala

Rajeev vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 05, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1332883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./633/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajeev

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....pin - 682031 other present: sri.vipin narayanan-pp this bail application having come up for admission on 05.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a.no.633 of 2023 2 p.v.kunhikrishnan, j -------------------------------- b.a.no.633 of 2023 ------------------------------- dated this the 05th day of may, 2023orderthis bail application is filed under section 438 of criminal procedure code (cr.p.c.)2. petitioner is the accused in crime no2209 of 2022 of thiruvalla police station, pathanamthittadistrict. the above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324 & 326 of the indian penal code (i.p.c.).3. the prosecution case is that at about 10.30 b.a.no.633 of 2023 3a.m. on 25.12.2022, while the de-facto complainant was talking with his neighbour, namely, ‘joy’ in the courtyard of ‘joy’, the accused came there and abused him uttering obscene words. when the de-facto complainant questioned the same, the accused caught hold of the de-facto complainant and slapped on his face. there are other allegations also.4. when this bail application came forconsideration, the learned public prosecutor submitted that sections 324 & 326 i.p.c. are deleted. if that is the case, all other offences are bailable offences. recording the submission of the learned public prosecutor, the bail application is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan, judge skk/04052023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 15TH VAISAKHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 633 OF 2023 CRIME NO.2209/2022 OF THIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: RAJEEV, AGED 43 YEARS, LAKSHAMVEEDUKOLANI, THENGELI, VTC KUTTOOR P.O, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689106 BY ADVS. JOSEPH GEORGE P.J.FRANCIS BIJO THOMAS GEORGE P.A.REJIMON SAJEEV JOHN T.

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT (STATE): STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.VIPIN NARAYANAN-PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.633 of 2023 2 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------- B.A.No.633 of 2023 ------------------------------- Dated this the 05th day of May, 2023

ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.)

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No2209 of 2022 of Thiruvalla Police Station, Pathanamthitta

District. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324 & 326 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.).

3. The prosecution case is that at about 10.30 B.A.No.633 of 2023 3

a.m. on 25.12.2022, while the de-facto complainant was talking with his neighbour, namely, ‘Joy’ in the courtyard of ‘Joy’, the accused came there and abused him uttering obscene words. When the de-facto complainant questioned the same, the accused caught hold of the de-facto complainant and slapped on his face. There are other allegations also.

4. When this bail application came for

consideration, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that Sections 324 & 326 I.P.C. are deleted. If that is the case, all other offences are bailable offences. Recording the submission of the learned Public Prosecutor, the bail application is closed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE Skk/04052023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial