Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shimi Kalam vs State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Kerala

Shimi Kalam vs State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1332799

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./612/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shimi Kalam

Respondent

State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. monday, the 30th day of january 2023 / 10th magha, 1944 bail appl. no. 612 of 2023 petitioner/accused: shimi kalam aged 48 years w/o m abdul kalam imi's villa homeway gardens chandavila po, thiruvananthapuram (dist)-, pin - 695584 by adv m.rajesh respondents/complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor high court of kerala ernakulam, pin - 682031 2 the station house officer pettah police station pettah po, thiruvananthapuram (dist)-, pin - 695024 adv c s hrithwik - sr pp this bail application having come up for admission on 30.01.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthis is an application submitted by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail.2. today, when the matter came up for consideration, thelearned public prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, no crime has been registered. in such circumstances, this bail application is closed but clarifying that, in case any further proceedings are to be initiated against the petitioner, the same shall be in compliance of the directions issued by the honourable supreme court in arnesh kumar vs. state of bihar and others [2014 (3) klt 143]. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a judge rpk appendix of bail appl. 612/2023 petitioner annexures annexure1 . the receipt issued by the complainant named philomina rosario to the petitioner for the receipt of rs 50,000/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 10TH MAGHA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 612 OF 2023 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SHIMI KALAM AGED 48 YEARS W/O M ABDUL KALAM IMI'S VILLA HOMEWAY GARDENS CHANDAVILA PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (DIST)-, PIN - 695584 BY ADV M.RAJESH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PETTAH POLICE STATION PETTAH PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (DIST)-, PIN - 695024 ADV C S HRITHWIK - SR PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This is an application submitted by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the

learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, no crime has been registered. In such circumstances, this bail application is closed but clarifying that, in case any further proceedings are to be initiated against the petitioner, the same shall be in compliance of the directions issued by the Honourable Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Others [2014 (3) KLT 143]. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A JUDGE rpk APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 612/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 . THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE COMPLAINANT NAMED PHILOMINA ROSARIO TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE RECEIPT OF RS 50,000/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial