Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murugan S vs Rajeev B.S

Murugan S vs Rajeev B.S

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 31, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1332640

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/118/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murugan S

Respondent

Rajeev B.S

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan tuesday, the 31st day of january 2023 / 11th magha, 1944 con.case(c) no. 118 of 2023 against the order/judgmentwp(c) 33424/2022 of high court of kerala petitioner/s: murugan s, aged 53 years s/o parameswaran, t.c 45/683(2), haitha nagar thoppil, thamalam, poojappura p.o thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695012 by advs. c.s.ajith prakash t.k.devarajan babu m. m.b.soori ancy thankachan nidhin raj vettikkadan haaris moosa gouri kailash krishnendu.d respondent/s: rajeev b.s age not known to the petitioner, father's name not known to the petitioner working as the chairman, kerala head load workers welfare board hadi towers t.c 24/1962, thaikkad p.o , pin - 695014 by adv thomas abraham this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 31.01.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.====================================================== ============================================================= dated this the 31st day of january, 2023judgmentwhen this contempt of court case came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 20.10.2022 in wp(c) no.33424 of 2022 are complied with and a copy of the order is handed over to the counsel appearing for the petitioner. in the light of the above, this contempt of court case is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge das -3- appendix of con.case(c) 118/2023 petitioner annexures annexurea1 certified copy of the judgment in w.p.(c) no. 33424/2022 dated 20/10/2022annexure a2 a true copy of the representation filed by the petitioner as one of the party dated 30/08/2022 to the dlo annexure a3 a true copy of the lawyer notice sent by registered post dated 25/11/2022 annexure a4 true copy of the reply no. e-5 3149/22 dated 05/12/2022 issued by the respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 11TH MAGHA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 118 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 33424/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: MURUGAN S, AGED 53 YEARS S/O PARAMESWARAN, T.C 45/683(2), HAITHA NAGAR THOPPIL, THAMALAM, POOJAPPURA P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012 BY ADVS. C.S.AJITH PRAKASH T.K.DEVARAJAN BABU M. M.B.SOORI ANCY THANKACHAN NIDHIN RAJ VETTIKKADAN HAARIS MOOSA GOURI KAILASH KRISHNENDU.D RESPONDENT/S: RAJEEV B.S AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD HADI TOWERS T.C 24/1962, THAIKKAD P.O , PIN - 695014 BY ADV Thomas Abraham THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

====================================================== ============================================================= Dated this the 31st day of January, 2023

JUDGMENT

When this contempt of court case came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 20.10.2022 in WP(C) No.33424 of 2022 are complied with and a copy of the order is handed over to the counsel appearing for the petitioner. In the light of the above, this Contempt of Court case is closed. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das -3- APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 118/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES AnnexureA1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.

(C) NO. 33424/2022 DATED 20/10/2022

Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS ONE OF THE PARTY DATED 30/08/2022 TO THE DLO Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE SENT BY REGISTERED POST DATED 25/11/2022 Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO. E-5 3149/22 DATED 05/12/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial