Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kannan vs Sukumaran

Kannan vs Sukumaran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 23, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1332081

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/1466/1994

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kannan

Respondent

Sukumaran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 23rd day of may 2023 / 2nd jyaishta, 1945 against the order dated 29.6.1994 in e.a.no.483/1993 in e.p.no.268/1993 in o.s.no.450/1998 of munsiff court, palakkadrevision petitioner/respondent/defendant: kannan, s/o chellan, residing at sekharipuram, puthur amsom, palakkad taluk by adv sri.t.c.suresh menon respondent/petitioner/plaintiff: sukumaran, s/o devaki amma, residing at sekharipuram, puthur amsom, palakkad taluk by advs. t.sethumadhavan smt.k.r.deepa sri.t.sethumadhavan this civil revision petition having come up for admission on 23.05.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that there is no communication from the party concerned and he is not in a position to argue the matter. hence, the same is recorded. nobody else came up for and on behalf of the petitioner. as such, this court has no other option but to dismiss the same for non-prosecution. hence, the c.r.p will stand dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge rkr-23/05/23

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2023 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.6.1994 IN E.A.NO.483/1993 IN E.P.NO.268/1993 IN O.S.NO.450/1998 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD

REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: KANNAN, S/O CHELLAN, RESIDING AT SEKHARIPURAM, PUTHUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK BY ADV SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: SUKUMARAN, S/O DEVAKI AMMA, RESIDING AT SEKHARIPURAM, PUTHUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK BY ADVS. T.SETHUMADHAVAN SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that there is no communication from the party concerned and he is not in a position to argue the matter. Hence, the same is recorded. Nobody else came up for and on behalf of the petitioner. As such, this court has no other option but to dismiss the same for non-prosecution. Hence, the C.R.P will stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-23/05/23

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial