Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Stibin vs State of Kerala

Stibin vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 20, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1330349

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./127/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Stibin

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen monday, the 20th day of february 2023 / 1st phalguna, 1944 bail appl. no. 127 of 2023 crime no.508/2022 of aroor police station, alappuzha petitioner/1st accused: stibin aged 25 years, s/o mathew, kottarakunnel house, ward no.10, piravam muncipality, ernakulam dist, pin - 686664 m.j.santhosh renjith b.marar respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682031 public prosecutor addl.director general of prosecution(ag-11) addl. state public prosecutor(ag-28) smt t v neema(sr pp) this bail application having come up for admission on 20.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a.no. 127 of 2023orderdated this the 20th day of february, 2023 this is an application for regular bail filed under section 439 of the code of criminal procedure, by the 1 st accused in crime no.508 of 2022 of aroor police station, alappuzha, where the accused alleged to have possessed 185 gram of mdma and 75.5 gram of hashish oil in a car bearing registration no.tn-43-x-6467 and hence committed offences punishable under sections 20(b) (ii)a, 22(c) and 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act.2. when the matter came up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this bail application. accordingly, permission granted. in the result, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the special court/sessions court dealing with this matter, for information and further guidance. sd/- a. badharudeen sk judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 127 OF 2023 CRIME NO.508/2022 OF AROOR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED: STIBIN AGED 25 YEARS, S/O MATHEW, KOTTARAKUNNEL HOUSE, WARD NO.10, PIRAVAM MUNCIPALITY, ERNAKULAM DIST, PIN - 686664 M.J.SANTHOSH RENJITH B.MARAR RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11) ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(AG-28) SMT T V NEEMA(SR PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No. 127 of 2023

ORDER

Dated this the 20th day of February, 2023 This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the 1 st accused in Crime No.508 of 2022 of Aroor Police Station, Alappuzha, where the accused alleged to have possessed 185 gram of MDMA and 75.5 gram of Hashish Oil in a car bearing registration No.TN-43-X-6467 and hence committed offences punishable under Sections 20(b) (ii)A, 22(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned

counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this bail application. Accordingly, permission granted. In the result, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Special Court/Sessions Court dealing with this matter, for information and further guidance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN SK JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial