Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abraham Samuel vs T.K.Daniel

Abraham Samuel vs T.K.Daniel

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 04, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1330210

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AS/500/2001

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abraham Samuel

Respondent

T.K.Daniel

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan tuesday, the 4th day of july 2023 / 13th ashadha, 1945 as no. 500 of 2001 against the decree and judgment dated 29.03.2001 in o.s.no.291/1997 of the ii additional sub court, ernakulam appellant - 2nd defendant in o.s.no.291/1997: abraham samuel, s/o. samuel, aged 42 years, proprietor, abraham samuel, and co., 42/1417, choolakkaparambu road, cochin-682018, represented by his power of attorney holder, sri. john samuel, s/o. samuel, aged 39 years, residing at 42/1417, choolakkaparambu road, cochin-682018. by advs. sri.p.gopakumaran nair k.jose kuriakose respondents - plaintiff and the 1st defendant in o.s.no.291/1997:1 t.k.daniel s/o. k.g. thomas, aged 71 years, proprietor, m/s. popular investments, h.b complex, kaloor, cochin-682017, represented by his power of attorney holder, sri.t.c. cherian, aged 55 years, s/o.late cherian t. cherian, cherry's bunglow, sea view ward, alleppey-12. 2 george k george, s/o. k.j. george, aged 38 years, infinite investments, first floor, c.l.s. building, m.g.road, cochin-682011. this appeal suits having come up for hearing on04.07.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: -: 2 :-sathish ninan, j.============================== ========================== dated this the 4th day of july, 2023judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions from the party. the appeal suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- sathish ninan, judge rsr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1945 AS NO. 500 OF 2001 AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 29.03.2001 IN O.S.NO.291/1997 OF THE II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT - 2ND DEFENDANT IN O.S.NO.291/1997: ABRAHAM SAMUEL, S/O. SAMUEL, AGED 42 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, ABRAHAM SAMUEL, AND CO., 42/1417, CHOOLAKKAPARAMBU ROAD, COCHIN-682018, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI. JOHN SAMUEL, S/O. SAMUEL, AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT 42/1417, CHOOLAKKAPARAMBU ROAD, COCHIN-682018. BY ADVS. SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR K.JOSE KURIAKOSE RESPONDENTS - PLAINTIFF AND THE 1ST DEFENDANT IN O.S.NO.291/1997:

1 T.K.DANIEL S/O. K.G. THOMAS, AGED 71 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. POPULAR INVESTMENTS, H.B COMPLEX, KALOOR, COCHIN-682017, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI.T.C. CHERIAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.LATE CHERIAN T. CHERIAN, CHERRY'S BUNGLOW, SEA VIEW WARD, ALLEPPEY-12. 2 GEORGE K GEORGE, S/O. K.J. GEORGE, AGED 38 YEARS, INFINITE INVESTMENTS, FIRST FLOOR, C.L.S. BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-682011. THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON

04.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -: 2 :-

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== ========================== Dated this the 4th day of July, 2023

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions from the party. The Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial