Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayan vs Vanajakshy

JAYAN vs Vanajakshy

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 05, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1330198

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/8/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JAYAN

Respondent

Vanajakshy

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice m.r.anitha wednesday, the 5th day of april 2023 / 15th chaithra, 1945 rsa no. 8 of 2023 against the judgment and decree dated 09.11.2016 in a.s. no.510/2015 of additional district court-ii, thiruvananthapuram against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.2009 in i.a. no.2148/2006 in o.s. no.1/1998 f.d. of munsiff court,attingal appellant/appellant/5th counter petitioner/5th defendant: jayan aged 50 years s/o rajan, kunnuvarathu, thulikkodu, pulimathu po, r.umasankar p.arun kumar (moncompu) respondents/respondents/petitioner & counter petitioner 1 to 4/first defendant, plaintiff and defendants 2 to 4: 1 vanajakshy 2 sathya bhama 3 soudamini d/o narayanan, sadanandathil, pulimath po, 4 sabu s/o late sadanandan, sadanandathil, pulimath po, 5 sajitha d/o late sadanandan, sadanandathil, pulimath po, liju mp - r1 revathi r. kurup(k/1866/2019) - r1 this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 05.04.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa no.8 of 2023judgmentdated this the 05th day of april, 2023 this appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in a.s. no.510/2015 on the file of additional district court-ii, thiruvananthapuram which in turn arouse out thejudgment and decree in i.a. no.2148/2006 in o.s. no.1/1998f.d. on the file of the munsiff's court, attingal.2. when the case was taken up, the learned counselfor the appellant submitted that a memo has been filed to the effect that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the above appeal further as the pendency of this appeal is a hindrance to surrender the property in question to authorities for the construction of a ring road. hence, he seeks to dismiss the appeal as not pressed. memo recorded. accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed. all pending i.as are closed. sd/- m.r.anitha judge smf

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1945 RSA NO. 8 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.11.2016 IN A.S. NO.510/2015 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.08.2009 IN I.A. NO.2148/2006 IN O.S. NO.1/1998 F.D. OF MUNSIFF COURT,ATTINGAL APPELLANT/APPELLANT/5TH COUNTER PETITIONER/5TH DEFENDANT: JAYAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O RAJAN, KUNNUVARATHU, THULIKKODU, PULIMATHU PO, R.UMASANKAR P.ARUN KUMAR (MONCOMPU) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & COUNTER PETITIONER 1 TO 4/FIRST DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4: 1 VANAJAKSHY 2 SATHYA BHAMA 3 SOUDAMINI D/O NARAYANAN, SADANANDATHIL, PULIMATH PO, 4 SABU S/O LATE SADANANDAN, SADANANDATHIL, PULIMATH PO, 5 SAJITHA D/O LATE SADANANDAN, SADANANDATHIL, PULIMATH PO, LIJU MP - R1 REVATHI R. KURUP(K/1866/2019) - R1 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA No.8 of 2023

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 05th day of April, 2023 This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in A.S. No.510/2015 on the file of Additional District Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram which in turn arouse out the

judgment and decree in I.A. No.2148/2006 in O.S. No.1/1998

F.D. on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Attingal.

2. When the case was taken up, the learned counsel

for the appellant submitted that a memo has been filed to the effect that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the above appeal further as the pendency of this appeal is a hindrance to surrender the property in question to authorities for the construction of a ring road. Hence, he seeks to dismiss the appeal as not pressed. Memo recorded. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed. All pending I.As are closed. Sd/- M.R.ANITHA JUDGE SMF

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial