Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Salam vs Dolfus,

Abdul Salam vs Dolfus,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 06, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1330133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AS/409/2001

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Salam

Respondent

Dolfus,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan tuesday, the 6th day of june 2023 / 16th jyaishta, 1945 as no. 409 of 2001 against the judgment and decree dated 29-7-2000 in os appellant/2nd defendant: abdul salam, charuvila veedu, manakkara muri, sasthamkotta village, kunnathur taluk. by advs. sri.p.c.sasidharan sri.o.v.maniprasad respondents/additional plaintiffs 2 to 4 and the 1st defendant : 1 dolfus (died), kochu mundappalli veedu, moovattupuzha, kanathan kunnam muri, padinjare kallada village, kunnathoor taluk. 2 reethakutty, vattathil house, vattayar ward, alappuzha, 3 joseph, kochu mundappallil veedu, kanatharkunnam muri, 4 mohammed kunju, charuvila veedu, manakkara muri, sasthamcotta village, kunnathoor taluk.this appeal suits having been finally heard on 06.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ============================== ========================== dated this the 6th day of june, 2023 learned counsel for the appellant submits that, to his information the parties have settled their disputes out of court and that presently he has no instructions from the party. hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. all pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. sd/- sathish ninan, judge amk dated 6-06-2023

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1945 AS NO. 409 OF 2001 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29-7-2000 IN OS APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT: ABDUL SALAM, CHARUVILA VEEDU, MANAKKARA MURI, SASTHAMKOTTA VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD RESPONDENTS/ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 4 AND THE 1ST DEFENDANT : 1 DOLFUS (DIED), KOCHU MUNDAPPALLI VEEDU, MOOVATTUPUZHA, KANATHAN KUNNAM MURI, PADINJARE KALLADA VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK. 2 REETHAKUTTY, VATTATHIL HOUSE, VATTAYAR WARD, ALAPPUZHA, 3 JOSEPH, KOCHU MUNDAPPALLIL VEEDU, KANATHARKUNNAM MURI, 4 MOHAMMED KUNJU, CHARUVILA VEEDU, MANAKKARA MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR TALUK.

THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ============================== ========================== Dated this the 6th day of June, 2023 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, to his information the parties have settled their disputes out of court and that presently he has no instructions from the party. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge amk Dated 6-06-2023

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial