Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sumesh, vs Vidhu,

Sumesh, vs VIDHU,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 24, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1329990

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/3/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumesh,

Respondent

VIDHU,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen thursday, the 24th day of august 2023 / 2nd bhadra, 1945 rpfc no. 3 of 2019order in mc 358/2017 dated 11.10.2018 of family court,thrissurrevision petitioner/respondent: sumesh, aged 43 years s/o.padinjarepurakkal sukumaran, valappad village, edamuttom desom, kazhimbram p.o., chavakkad taluk, thrissur district-680568. m.r.jayalatha sri.a.p.vasavan respondent/petitioner: vidhu, aged 33 years, d/o.venu, nelluvai house, athani p.o., gramala desom, killannoor village, thrissur taluk, thrissur district-680 581. sri.m.jayakrishnan sri.g.unnikrishnan this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 24.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rp(fc)no.3/2019 2orderdated this the 24th day of august, 2023 learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled. therefore, the revision petitioner is not intended to proceed further. learned counsel representing the respondent also conceded the same. in view of the settlement, rp(fc) stands dismissed and the right of maintenance of the respondent herein shall be governed by the terms of mediation agreement. sd/- a. badharudeen judge csl

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 2ND BHADRA, 1945 RPFC NO. 3 OF 2019

ORDER IN MC 358/2017 DATED 11.10.2018 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR

REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: SUMESH, AGED 43 YEARS S/O.PADINJAREPURAKKAL SUKUMARAN, VALAPPAD VILLAGE, EDAMUTTOM DESOM, KAZHIMBRAM P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680568. M.R.JAYALATHA SRI.A.P.VASAVAN RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: VIDHU, AGED 33 YEARS, D/O.VENU, NELLUVAI HOUSE, ATHANI P.O., GRAMALA DESOM, KILLANNOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 581. SRI.M.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RP(FC)No.3/2019 2

ORDER

Dated this the 24th day of August, 2023 Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled. Therefore, the revision petitioner is not intended to proceed further. Learned counsel representing the respondent also conceded the same. In view of the settlement, RP(FC) stands dismissed and the right of maintenance of the respondent herein shall be governed by the terms of mediation agreement. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE csl

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial