T.K.Jayakrishnan vs P.M.Ramakrishnan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 29, 2023

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1329821

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1329821
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
Decided On: Mar 29, 2023
Case Number: AS/20/2002

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.K.Jayakrishnan

Respondent

P.M.Ramakrishnan

Excerpt

as no. 387 of 2002 appellant/defendant: ramakrishnan p.m., s/o manikkan pillai, west and co. engineering works, opposite, indira gandhi stadium, coimbatore road, sulthan pet, palakkad town and taluk, palghat district. respondent/plaintiff: jaithra film exhibitors, kottathara village, kalpetta post, vythiri taluk, wynad district. along with as.20/2002, the court on the same day delivered the as no. 20 of 2002 appellant/plaintiff: jaithra film exhibitors, kalpetta post, kottathara village, vythiri taluk, wynad district. by adv.sri.a.k.alex s.anitha respondent/defendant: p.m.ramakrishnan, s/o manikkan pillai, proprietor, west and co.engineering works,, opp.indira gandhi stadium, coimbatore road, sulthanpet, palakkad town & taluk, palakkad dist. along with as.387/2002, the court on the same day delivered thejudgmentthe appellant and the counsel remained absent. the appeal is of the year 2002. now almost 20 years have elapsed. the appeal so far, is not admitted. this would show what is behind it. hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. both the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp

Full Judgment

AS NO. 387 OF 2002 APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: RAMAKRISHNAN P.M., S/O MANIKKAN PILLAI, WEST AND CO. ENGINEERING WORKS, OPPOSITE, INDIRA GANDHI STADIUM, COIMBATORE ROAD, SULTHAN PET, PALAKKAD TOWN AND TALUK, PALGHAT DISTRICT. RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: JAITHRA FILM EXHIBITORS, KOTTATHARA VILLAGE, KALPETTA POST, VYTHIRI TALUK, WYNAD DISTRICT. ALONG WITH AS.20/2002, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE AS NO. 20 OF 2002 APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: JAITHRA FILM EXHIBITORS, KALPETTA POST, KOTTATHARA VILLAGE, VYTHIRI TALUK, WYNAD DISTRICT. BY ADV.SRI.A.K.ALEX S.ANITHA RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: P.M.RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O MANIKKAN PILLAI, PROPRIETOR, WEST AND CO.ENGINEERING WORKS,, OPP.INDIRA GANDHI STADIUM, COIMBATORE ROAD, SULTHANPET, PALAKKAD TOWN & TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST. ALONG WITH AS.387/2002, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

JUDGMENT

The appellant and the counsel remained absent. The appeal is of the year 2002. Now almost 20 years have elapsed. The appeal so far, is not admitted. This would show what is behind it. Hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. Both the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2023 Same Parties T.K.Jayakrishnan vs P.M.Ramakrishnan Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan