Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramadas, vs the Ottapalam Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd No. F 1647 , Represented by Its Branch Manager,

Ramadas, vs The Ottapalam Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd No. F 1647 , Represented by Its Branch Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1329437

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/27344/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramadas,

Respondent

The Ottapalam Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd No. F 1647 , Represented by Its Branch Manager,

Excerpt

.....he secured the loan by creating an equitable mortgage in respect of his property comprised in survey no.75/7 situated in ottapalam taluk, palakkad district. the petitioner failed to discharge the loan liability, and therefore, the bank classified the petitioner’s loan account as npa on 22.07.2023. thereafter, the bank proceeded with the sarfaesi proceedings and notice -3- under section 13(2) of the sarfaesi act was issued in ext.p1 on 06.05.2024. the bank has taken symbolic possession of the secured asset.3. ms devi padma, holding for mr vinod madhavan,learned counsel for the bank, submits that this court may grant the petitioner some instalments to pay off the entire outstanding liability towards the bank, which is said to be rs.9,98,517/-.4. considering the said stand of the respondent bank,the present writ petition is disposed of on the following terms: i. the petitioners shall pay the entire outstanding dues in respect of the loan advanced by the respondent bank to the petitioner in twelve equal monthly instalments. ii. the first instalment is to be paid on or before 20.08.2024 and the remaining eleven instalments on or before the 15th day of each succeeding month. iii. if the first or any subsequent instalments are not paid, the bank shall be free to proceed against the petitioner in -4- accordance with the law. the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- dinesh kumar singh judge jjj -5- appendix of wp(c) 27344/2024 petitioner exhibits exhibit -p1 true copy of notice issued to the petitioner, atthe instance of the 2nd respondent, under 13(2) of securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002, dated 06.05.24. exhibit - p2 true copy of the disability certificate issued to the petitioner at the instance of superintendent & chairman district hospital palakkad, dated 29.11.16.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27344 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: RAMADAS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. DAMODARAN NAIR, HARISREE NILAYAM, PANAMANNA SOUTH, OTTAPALM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679501 BY ADV K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE OTTAPALAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD NO. F 1647, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MAIN BRANCH, MAIN ROAD, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679101 2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE OTTAPALAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD NO. F 1647, HEAD OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679101 3 MRS. PREMKUMARI, W/O. DAMODARAN NAIR, AGED 48 YEARS, HARISREE NILAYAM, PANAMANNA SOUTH, OTTAPALM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679501 4 MANOJ KUMAR,S/O. DAMODARAN NAIR, HARISREE NILAYAM, PANAMANNA SOUTH, OTTAPALM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 5 HARINARAYANAN, S/O. DAMODARAN NAIR, HARISREE NILAYAM, PANAMANNA SOUTH, OTTAPALM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679501 BY MS DEVI PADMA HOLDING FOR ADV VINOD MADHAVAN SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: “1. To issue a Writ of Mandamus or appropriate Writ or direction commanding the respondents to provide reasonable time to pay off the dues, outstanding in the loan with A/c No. 00111800080386, availed by the petitioner, in the interest of justice.

2. To pass any such further orders as the petitioners may seek and this Hon'ble Court deem fit to grant in the interest of justice.”

2. The petitioner obtained a mortgage loan from the

respondent Bank for Rs.7 lakhs on 23.12.2020. He secured the loan by creating an equitable mortgage in respect of his property comprised in Survey No.75/7 situated in Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad District. The petitioner failed to discharge the loan liability, and therefore, the Bank classified the petitioner’s loan account as NPA on 22.07.2023. Thereafter, the Bank proceeded with the SARFAESI proceedings and notice -3- under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act was issued in Ext.P1 on 06.05.2024. The Bank has taken symbolic possession of the secured asset.

3. Ms Devi Padma, holding for Mr Vinod Madhavan,

learned Counsel for the Bank, submits that this Court may grant the petitioner some instalments to pay off the entire outstanding liability towards the Bank, which is said to be Rs.9,98,517/-.

4. Considering the said stand of the respondent Bank,

the present writ petition is disposed of on the following terms: i. The petitioners shall pay the entire outstanding dues in respect of the loan advanced by the respondent Bank to the petitioner in twelve equal monthly instalments. ii. The first instalment is to be paid on or before 20.08.2024 and the remaining eleven instalments on or before the 15th day of each succeeding month. iii. If the first or any subsequent instalments are not paid, the Bank shall be free to proceed against the petitioner in -4- accordance with the law. The writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE jjj -5- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27344/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit -P1 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER, AT

THE INSTANCE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT, UNDER 13(2) OF SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002, DATED 06.05.24. Exhibit - P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER AT THE INSTANCE OF SUPERINTENDENT & CHAIRMAN DISTRICT HOSPITAL PALAKKAD, DATED 29.11.16.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial