Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

George Sunu vs Joseph Thomas

George Sunu vs Joseph Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 24, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1329011

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (RC)/90/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

George Sunu

Respondent

Joseph Thomas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice amit rawal & the honourable mr. justice easwaran s. wednesday, the 24th day of july 2024 / 2nd sravana, 1946 against the order/judgment dated 01.07.2024 in rcp no.1 of 2023 of munsiff court, changanacherry petitioner(s)/petitioner/original respondent: george sunu aged 51 years s/o. george, puthuparambil house, malankunnam p.o., ithithanam, kurichy, changancherry. kottayam district, pin - 686532 by advs. p.haridas biju hariharan shijimol m.mathew p.c.shijin roshin mariam jacob respondent(s)/respondent/original petitioner: joseph thomas aged 79 years thoompunkal house, kurisumoodu p.o., chethipuzha, changanacherry kottayam., pin - 686104 this op (rent control) having come up for admission on 24.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentamit rawal, j.learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, realising that this court is going to dismiss the petition with exemplary costs, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take up the plea to discharge the burden when the case would be ripe for leading evidence in defence. revision petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty aforementioned. amit rawal easwaran s. nak appendix of op (rc) 90/2024 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the rcp no. 1/2023 before filed by the respondent dated 05.01.2023 exhibit p2 true copy of the commission report in 01.03.2023 exhibit p3 true copy of the objection in rcp no. court, changanacherry filed by the petitioner dated 19.07.2023 exhibit p4 true copy of the approved plan of the building newly constructed by the landlord dated 14.06.2022 exhibit p5 true copy of the objection filed by the petitioner to the commission report in 17.11.2023 exhibit p6 true copy of the i.a. no. 5/2023 in rcpno. 1/2023 filed before the rent control court, changanacherry filed by the petitioner dated 17.11.2023 exhibit p7 true copy of the objection to i.a. no......

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1946 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 01.07.2024 IN RCP NO.1 OF 2023 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/ORIGINAL RESPONDENT: GEORGE SUNU AGED 51 YEARS S/O. GEORGE, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MALANKUNNAM P.O., ITHITHANAM, KURICHY, CHANGANCHERRY. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686532 BY ADVS. P.HARIDAS BIJU HARIHARAN SHIJIMOL M.MATHEW P.C.SHIJIN ROSHIN MARIAM JACOB RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/ORIGINAL PETITIONER: JOSEPH THOMAS AGED 79 YEARS THOOMPUNKAL HOUSE, KURISUMOODU P.O., CHETHIPUZHA, CHANGANACHERRY KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686104 THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, realising that this Court is going to dismiss the petition with exemplary costs, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take up the plea to discharge the burden when the case would be ripe for leading evidence in defence. Revision petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty aforementioned. AMIT RAWAL EASWARAN S. nak APPENDIX OF OP (RC) 90/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RCP NO. 1/2023 BEFORE FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 05.01.2023 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT IN 01.03.2023 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION IN RCP NO. COURT, CHANGANACHERRY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19.07.2023 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED PLAN OF THE BUILDING NEWLY CONSTRUCTED BY THE LANDLORD DATED 14.06.2022 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE COMMISSION REPORT IN 17.11.2023 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 5/2023 IN RCP

NO. 1/2023 FILED BEFORE THE RENT CONTROL COURT, CHANGANACHERRY FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 17.11.2023 Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO I.A. NO. DATED 28.11.2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I. A. NO. 01.07.2024 Transalation English translation of Exhibit P2. Transalation English Translation of Malayalam Portion of Exhibit P6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial