Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Faizal vs State of Kerala

Faizal vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1328979

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./6095/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Faizal

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....2 halim aged 65 years s/o. muhammed kashim, noufal manzil, ayiroor p.o, elakamon, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695310 3 nabeesathu beevi aged 53 years w/o. halim, noufal manzil, ayiroor p.o, elakamon, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695310 by adv liju. m.p respondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 other present: sr pp smt neema t v this bail application having come up for admission on 01.08.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: -:2:- dated this the 1st day of august, 2024orderthe application is filed under section 482 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (in short, ‘bnss’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioners apprehend arrest in an unknown crime registered by the airoor police station, thiruvananthapuram, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence. hence, the bail application.3. heard; sri. liju m.p., the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and smt. seetha s., the learned senior public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions,submitted that as on today there is no case registered against the petitioners by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. the said submission is recorded. in the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. it is made clear that, if the -:3:- presence of the petitioners are required by airoor police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, they shall be issued with a notice under section 35(3) of the bnss, if the offence alleged against them are punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/01.08.24 //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 6095 OF 2024 CRIME NO.0/0 OF AIROOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONERS: 1 FAIZAL AGED 25 YEARS S/O. HALIM, NOUFAL MANZIL, AYIROOR P.O, ELAKAMON, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695310 2 HALIM AGED 65 YEARS S/O. MUHAMMED KASHIM, NOUFAL MANZIL, AYIROOR P.O, ELAKAMON, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695310 3 NABEESATHU BEEVI AGED 53 YEARS W/O. HALIM, NOUFAL MANZIL, AYIROOR P.O, ELAKAMON, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695310 BY ADV LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SMT NEEMA T V THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 1st day of August, 2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short, ‘BNSS’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in an unknown crime registered by the Airoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence. Hence, the bail application.

3. Heard; Sri. Liju M.P., the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt. Seetha S., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submitted that as on today there is no case registered against the petitioners by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. The said submission is recorded. In the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. It is made clear that, if the -:3:- presence of the petitioners are required by Airoor Police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, they shall be issued with a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, if the offence alleged against them are punishable for less than seven years. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/01.08.24 //True copy// P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial