Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ansar a vs the State of Kerala

Ansar a vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2024
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1328498

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/24771/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ansar a

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....only the party respondents appeared and the petitioner is not co-operating with the police. moreover, in spite of the stop memo issued by the panchayath, the petitioner is carrying out his activities in the residential area.6. although i find merit in the contention of thelearned counsel for the party respondents that the petitioner having suppressed vital facts, the writ petition ought to be dismissed with cost, i refrain from doing so, since some of the events had occurred after filing of the writ petition. at any rate, this is not a fit case for granting police protection to the petitioner. the writ petition is hence, dismissed. sd/- v.g.arun judge nb/31-7 appendix of wp(c) 24771/2024 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the lease agreement dated 29.04.2024 with one mr. p.g.sajimon exhibit p2 the true copy of the site approval and building permit issued from the ellampallor grama panchayat, dated 20.05.2024 exhibit p3 true copy of the complaint submitted by the petitioner before the sho, kundara dated 01.07.2024 exhibit p4 true copy of the receipt dated 04.07.20234 issued by the kundara police exhibit p5 the true copy of the complaint submitted by the petitioner before the dysp, sasthamcottah dated 06.07.2024 exhibit p6 the true copy of the receipt dated 06.07.2024 issued from the sasthamcotta dysp office respondent exhibits exhibit-r4(a) a true copy of the letter dated 10.06.2024given to the secretary, elamppalloor grama panchayat exhibit-r4(b) their complaint letters dated 25.06.2024 and 05.07.2024 exhibit-r4(c) their complaint letters dated 25.06.2024 and 05.07.2024 exhibit-r4(d) a true copy of the report dated 28.06.2024 exhibit-r4(e) a copy of photograph showing the diesel generator mounted trucks in the property exhibit-r4(f) a true copy of the decision taken by the panchayat dated 12.07.2024 true copy p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24771 OF 2024 PETITIONER: ANSAR A AGED 62 YEARS S/O. ABDUL AZIZ, RESIDING AT KALAVARA VEEDU, PUNNATHALA.P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691007 BY ADVS. S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) NAMITHA RAJESH RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN - 695001 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-, PIN - 691504 3 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SASTHAMCOTTAH, COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLAM, PIN - 690521 4 JACAB @ SHAJI THADATHIVILA VEEDU, VADAKKATHIL, NEDUMPANA,KURIPALLY,THRIKOVIL VATTOM VILLAGE, ALUMOODU.P.O., KOLLAM-, PIN - 691577 5 SAJAN JOSHY RESIDING AT SEYON, KURIPALLY,THRIKOVIL VATTOM VILLAGE, 6 C.JOHNKUTTY THUNDUVILA VEEDU, KURIPALLY,THRIKOVIL VATTOM VILLAGE, 7 THOMAS MATHEW LIJU BHAVAN, KURIPALLY,THRIKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE, 8 ANIL PHILIP KURIPALLY,THRIKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE, ALUMOODU.P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691577 BY ADVS. BHARATH MOHAN N.KRISHNA PRASAD(K/885/2004) JOEL GEORGE KAMPIYIL(K/1910/2020)

OTHER PRESENT: SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of July, 2024 This writ petition is filed alleging obstruction and nuisance by the party respondents. According to the petitioner, he has taken a plot on lease in the neighborhood of the party respondents and has constructed a shed therein, after obtaining permit from the Panchayath. Although petitioner had cleared the property after taking it on lease, respondents are dumping waste in the property, following their earlier practice.

2. The party respondents have filed a counter

affidavit, refuting the allegation and further stating that the petitioner is running an event management company and as part of its activities, innumerable number of generator-mounted trucks are parked in the plot. The generator sets are repaired and tested in the compound even at night, making it impossible for the neighbors to live peacefully. Therefore, alleging pollution and nuisance due to the activities of the petitioner, the respondents had approached the authorities and the Panchayath has initiated action against the petitioner.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client is prepared to undertake that he will not carry out any work on the diesel generator sets in the leased premise.

4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the party respondents submitted that there cannot be any such concession, since the authorities have already initiated action.

5. The learned Government Pleader submitted

that, even though the Police had summoned the petitioner and the party respondents, only the party respondents appeared and the petitioner is not co-operating with the Police. Moreover, in spite of the stop memo issued by the Panchayath, the petitioner is carrying out his activities in the residential area.

6. Although I find merit in the contention of the

learned Counsel for the party respondents that the petitioner having suppressed vital facts, the writ petition ought to be dismissed with cost, I refrain from doing so, since some of the events had occurred after filing of the writ petition. At any rate, this is not a fit case for granting Police protection to the petitioner. The writ petition is hence, dismissed. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE NB/31-7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24771/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 29.04.2024 WITH ONE MR. P.G.SAJIMON EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED FROM THE ELLAMPALLOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, DATED 20.05.2024 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SHO, KUNDARA DATED 01.07.2024 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 04.07.20234 ISSUED BY THE KUNDARA POLICE EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DYSP, SASTHAMCOTTAH DATED 06.07.2024 EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 06.07.2024 ISSUED FROM THE SASTHAMCOTTA DYSP OFFICE RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-R4(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.06.2024GIVEN TO THE SECRETARY, ELAMPPALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT EXHIBIT-R4(b) THEIR COMPLAINT LETTERS DATED 25.06.2024 AND 05.07.2024 EXHIBIT-R4(c) THEIR COMPLAINT LETTERS DATED 25.06.2024 AND 05.07.2024 EXHIBIT-R4(d) A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 28.06.2024 EXHIBIT-R4(e) A COPY OF PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE DIESEL GENERATOR MOUNTED TRUCKS IN THE PROPERTY EXHIBIT-R4(f) A TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION TAKEN BY THE PANCHAYAT DATED 12.07.2024 TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial