Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pradeep Kumar S vs State of Kerala

Pradeep Kumar S vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 24, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1328442

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5754/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep Kumar S

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 24th day of july 2024 / 2nd sravana, 1946 petitioner/s: pradeep kumar s aged 65 years s/o. sukumaran, flat no. 4e, horizon park, vellayambalam, thrivananthapuram, pin - 695010 by advs. k.v.anil kumar radhika s.anil respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 the station house officer town north police station, ernakulam district, pin - other present: sr pp smt seetha s this bail application having come up for admission on 24.07.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthe application is filed under section 482 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (in short, ‘bnss’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner apprehends arrest in an unknown crime by the town north police station, ernakulam for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.3. heard; sri.k.v.anilkumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt.seetha s., the learned senior public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that there is no crime registered against the petitioner as alleged in the bail application as on today. the said submission is recorded. in the light of the above submission, the bailapplication is closed. it is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by the town north police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under section 35(3) of the bnss, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias,judge rkc/24.07.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: PRADEEP KUMAR S AGED 65 YEARS S/O. SUKUMARAN, FLAT NO. 4E, HORIZON PARK, VELLAYAMBALAM, THRIVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010 BY ADVS. K.V.ANIL KUMAR RADHIKA S.ANIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SMT SEETHA S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short, ‘BNSS’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in an unknown crime by the Town North Police Station, Ernakulam for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri.K.V.Anilkumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Seetha S., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that there is no crime registered against the petitioner as alleged in the bail application as on today. The said submission is recorded. In the light of the above submission, the bail

application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by the Town North Police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE Rkc/24.07.2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial