Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2024 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 5388 OF 2024 CRIME NO.40/2024 OF NEYYATTINKARA EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: KELSON, AGED 34 YEARS S/O STEEPHAN, VADAKKEVALIYAVILA VEEDU, NEDUTHANNI, MULLOOR DESOM, VIZHINJAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695523 BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.SASITH SMT.R.K.CHIRUTHA SMT.NEELANJANA NAIR SMT.ANJANA SURESH.E SMT.REETHU JACOB SMT.RIYA KOCHUMMAN SMT.NANMA.B.B SMT.LIDHIYA GEORGE RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SR. PP SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2024 The application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the sole accused in Crime No.40/2024 of the Neyyattinkara Excise Range Office, Thiruvanathapuram, which is registered against him, for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Sections 55(i), 55(a) and 67(B) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1 of 1077. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.06.2024.
2. The gist of the prosecution case is that: on
20.06.2024 at around 20.00 hours, the accused was found in conscious possession of 65 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, which was transporting in an autorickshaw bearing Registration No.KL-20-P-6445 through the Kovalam-Vizhinjam road. The accused was arrested on the spot with the contraband article. Thus, the accused has committed the above offences.
3. Heard Sri.Sasith M.R, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent of the accusations levelled against him. He has been falsely implicated in the crime. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.06.2024, the investigation in the case is practically complete and recovery has been effected. Moreover, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. Hence, the petitioner may be released on bail.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
application. He submitted that the investigation is in progress. He also stated that if the petitioner is released on bail, he would commit a similar offence. Hence, the application may be dismissed.
6. On an anxious consideration of the facts, the
rival submissions made across the Bar and the materials placed on record, especially on considering the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 21.06.2024, that the contraband involved in the case is of a small quantity, that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents, that the investigation in the case is practically complete and recovery has been effected, I am of the view that the petitioner’s further detention is unnecessary. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail. In the result, the application is allowed, by directing the petitioner to be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction, which shall be subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer on every alternate Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. He shall also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required;
(ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or procure to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so
as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts
to the court or to any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner, whatsoever;
(iii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while they are on bail;
(iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond
(v) In case of violation of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the jurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.
(vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall be filed and entertained before the court below.
(vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within
the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State(NCT of Delhi) and Anr. [2020 (1) KHC 663]. Sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE NAB