Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

XXX vs State of Kerala

XXX vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 06, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1327049

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/4880/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

XXX

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen thursday, the 6th day of june 2024 / 16th jyaishta, 1946 crl.mc no. 4880 of 2024 crime no.0364/2023 of kadavanthra police station, ernakulam against the order dated in bail appl. no.10359 of 2023 of high court of kerala petitioner/accused: xxx xxx by adv millu dandapani respondents/state&defacto complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by the government pleader, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682031 2 xxx xxx sr pp renjit george this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 06.06.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c.no.4880 of 2024. :2:orderdated this the 6th day of june, 2024.this criminal miscellaneous case has been filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, to quash annexure a1 fir in crime no.364/2023 of kadavanthra police station, allleging commission of offences punishable under sections 376(2), 323 and 342 of ipc and sections 3 & 4 of the protection of children from sexual offences act (amended) 2012, 2019.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner argued at length to convince this court that no offence made out, primafacie, from the prosecution records. since he failed in this endevour and when this court was about to dismiss this petition, holding that there are sufficient materials to go for trial, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition. permission granted.3. accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. crl.m.c.no.4880 of 2024. :3: registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the trial court, for information and compliance. sd/- a. badharudeen judge rpr/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 4880 OF 2024 CRIME NO.0364/2023 OF KADAVANTHRA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM AGAINST THE ORDER DATED IN Bail Appl. NO.10359 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: XXX XXX BY ADV MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS/STATE&DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 XXX XXX SR PP RENJIT GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.No.4880 of 2024. :2:

ORDER

Dated this the 6th day of June, 2024.

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash Annexure A1 FIR in crime No.364/2023 of Kadavanthra Police Station, allleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 376(2), 323 and 342 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Amended) 2012, 2019.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued at length to convince this Court that no offence made out, prima

facie, from the prosecution records. Since he failed in this endevour and when this Court was about to dismiss this petition, holding that there are sufficient materials to go for trial, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition. Permission granted.

3. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Crl.M.C.No.4880 of 2024. :3: Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the trial Court, for information and compliance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE RPR/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial