Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ananthu a, vs State of Kerala,

Ananthu a, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1326908

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4665/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ananthu a,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 1st day of august 2024 / 10th sravana, 1946 bail appl. no. 4665 of 2024 crime no.548/2023 of kuttiyadi police station, kozhikode petitioner/accused: ananthu a, aged 28 years kadukayil kizhakkathil, valiyapadam,vilanthara po, west kallada,kollam., pin - 690521 by advs. anandhu satheesh v.g.suresh sreedevi s. drisya dileep respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 station house officer, kuttiyadi police station, kozhikod district-, pin - 673508 by smt neema t v senior public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 01.08.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.no.4665 of 2024 -:2:- dated this the 1st day of august, 2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner is the sole accused in crime no.which is registered against the accused (two in number) for allegedly committing the offences punishable under sections 354a(1)(ii) and 354a(1)(iv) of the indian penal code.3. heard; sri.anandhu satheesh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt. neema. t.v, the learned public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instruction,submitted that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are bailable in nature. the said submission is recorded. b.a.no.4665 of 2024 -:3:- in the light of the above submission, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional court and work out his remedies in accordance with the law. sd/- c.s.dias,judge mtk/01.08.24 //true copy// to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 4665 OF 2024 CRIME NO.548/2023 OF KUTTIYADI POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANANTHU A, AGED 28 YEARS KADUKAYIL KIZHAKKATHIL, VALIYAPADAM,VILANTHARA PO, WEST KALLADA,KOLLAM., PIN - 690521 BY ADVS. ANANDHU SATHEESH V.G.SURESH SREEDEVI S. DRISYA DILEEP RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUTTIYADI POLICE STATION, KOZHIKOD DISTRICT-, PIN - 673508 BY SMT NEEMA T V SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.4665 of 2024 -:2:- Dated this the 1st day of August, 2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.

which is registered against the accused (two in number) for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 354A(1)(ii) and 354A(1)(iv) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard; Sri.Anandhu Satheesh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Neema. T.V, the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instruction,

submitted that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are bailable in nature. The said submission is recorded. B.A.No.4665 of 2024 -:3:- In the light of the above submission, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the Jurisdictional Court and work out his remedies in accordance with the law. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/01.08.24 //True copy// To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial