Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nabeesa, vs the District Collector,

Nabeesa, vs The District Collector,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1326803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/19673/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nabeesa,

Respondent

The District Collector,

Excerpt

.....the same day delivered the following: -3-mohammed nias c.p., j.----------------------------------------------- wp(c)no.19673 of 2024 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of may, 2024judgmentthe petitioner has preferred ext.p8 appeal along with a stay petition challenging ext.p7.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on the stay petition so far.3. accordingly, there will be a direction to the seventh respondent topass orders on the stay petition filed along with the revision, within two weeks from today. the appeal will be disposed of within three months. till orders are passed in the stay petition, status quo as on today shall be maintained. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge dlk/31.05.2024 -4- appendix of wp(c) 19673/2024 petitioners exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the tax receipt dated 24.05.2023 issued by the fourth respondent to the exhibit p2 true photographs of the property of the exhibit p3 true copy of the application dated 27.12.2022 submitted by the petitioner in form 5 before the second respondent exhibit p4 true copy of the stop memo issued by the fourth respondent to the petitioner dated 22.12.2020 exhibit p5 true copy of the notice no. a4-8857/22 dated 15.12.2022 issued by the second respondent to the petitioner exhibit p6 true copy of the representation submitted bythe petitioner before the second respondent with copy to the third and fourth respondent dated 3.06.2023 exhibit p7 true copy of the order dated 27.3.2024 issued by the first respondent exhibit p8 true copy of the revision petition along with stay petition submitted by the petitioner before the seventh respondent dated 20.05.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 19673 OF 2024 PETITIONER: NABEESA, AGED 67 YEARS WIFE OF SEETHI, ARAKKAKUDI MUNDATH, VENGOLA P.O., ARAKKAPPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, BY ADVS. P.M.ZIRAJ IRFAN ZIRAJ RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682030 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (R.D.O.), 3 THAHASILDAR,(L.R.), KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683543 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, 5 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE (LLMC), VENGOLA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, VENGOLA, ERNAKULM DISTRICT, PIN - 683556 6 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, VENGOLA, 7 PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, -2- GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 SMT.AMMINIKUTTY K, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

----------------------------------------------- WP(C)No.19673 of 2024 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 appeal along with a stay petition challenging Ext.P7.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on the stay petition so far.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the seventh respondent to

pass orders on the stay petition filed along with the revision, within two weeks from today. The appeal will be disposed of within three months. Till orders are passed in the stay petition, status quo as on today shall be maintained. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE dlk/31.05.2024 -4- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19673/2024 PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 24.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT TO THE EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY OF THE EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 27.12.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM 5 BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 22.12.2020 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. A4-8857/22 DATED 15.12.2022 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY

THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 3.06.2023 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.3.2024 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION ALONG WITH STAY PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SEVENTH RESPONDENT DATED 20.05.2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial