Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajikumar C.a, vs State of Kerala

Ajikumar C.a, vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1326344

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/4438/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajikumar C.a,

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen tuesday, the 28th day of may 2024 / 7th jyaishta, 1946 crl.mc no. 4438 of 2024 crime no.1354/2021 of kalamassery police station, ernakulam sc no.176 of 2022 of fast track special court, aluva petitioner/accused no.2: xxxxxxxxxx by advs. sam isaac pothiyil s.suraja muhammed suhair c.a ramu subhash karan mathew ananthakrishnan r. respondents/state & de facto complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682031 2 station house officer, kalamassery police station, ernakulam district, pin - 3 xxxxxxxxxx r1 & r2 by sr.public prosecutor sri.renjit george this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28.05.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.mc no. 4438 of 2024 2orderdated this the 28th day of may, 2024 this is a petition filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, to quash all further proceedings in annexure a1 fir and fis and annexure a2 final report in crime no.1354/2021 of kalamassery police station, ernakulam district, now pending as s.c.no.176/2022 on the files of fast track court, aluva, ernakulam district.2. at the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner tried to canvass the innocence of the petitioner herein/2 nd accused, while pressing for quashment.3. after arguing for a while, the learned counsel for thepetitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition. permission granted and this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the sessions court for information and future guidance. sd/- a. badharudeen judge bb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 4438 OF 2024 CRIME NO.1354/2021 OF KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM SC NO.176 OF 2022 OF FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT, ALUVA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS. SAM ISAAC POTHIYIL S.SURAJA MUHAMMED SUHAIR C.A RAMU SUBHASH KARAN MATHEW ANANTHAKRISHNAN R. RESPONDENTS/STATE & DE FACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 3 XXXXXXXXXX R1 & R2 BY SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RENJIT GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.MC NO. 4438 OF 2024 2

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024 This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash all further proceedings in Annexure A1 FIR and FIS and Annexure A2 Final Report in Crime No.1354/2021 of Kalamassery Police Station, Ernakulam District, now pending as S.C.No.176/2022 on the files of Fast Track Court, Aluva, Ernakulam District.

2. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner tried to canvass the innocence of the petitioner herein/2 nd accused, while pressing for quashment.

3. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for the

petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition. Permission granted and this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Sessions Court for information and future guidance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE Bb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial