Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh @ Manoj, vs State of Kerala,

Rajesh @ Manoj, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 03, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1325306

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3974/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh @ Manoj,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 3rd day of june 2024 / 13th jyaishta, 1946 bail appl. no. 3974 of 2024 crime no.422/2011 of pathanamthitta police station, pathanamthitta in cc no.10 of 2024 of chief judicial magistrate pathanamthitta petitioner/accused no.5: rajesh @ manoj, aged 45 years s/o. chandy, mlaveena parackkal veedu, ullayam, edchirikkapuzha, kangazha village, kottayam district, pin - 686 541.by adv p.a.mujeeb respondent/complainant: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682 031. other present: sr pp smt seetha s ,sr pp sri c s hrithwik this bail application having come up for admission on 03.06.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: dated this the 3rd day of june, 2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973(‘code’, for short), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner is the 5th accused inc.c.no.10/2024 of the chief judicial magistrate court registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under sections 120(b), 418, 420 and 421 r/w section 34 of the indian penal code and sections 10 and 24 of the emigration act,1983.3. heard; sri. p.a.mujeeb, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt. seetha s. the learned senior public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the above case has been closed by the above court invoking rule 16(1) of the criminal rules ofpractice. therefore, the present application is unwarranted. the said submission is recorded. in the light of the above submission, the application is closed. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rmm/3/6/2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 3974 OF 2024 CRIME NO.422/2011 OF PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA IN CC NO.10 OF 2024 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PATHANAMTHITTA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5: RAJESH @ MANOJ, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. CHANDY, MLAVEENA PARACKKAL VEEDU, ULLAYAM, EDCHIRIKKAPUZHA, KANGAZHA VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 541.

BY ADV P.A.MUJEEB RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031. OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SMT SEETHA S ,SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973(‘Code’, for short), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the 5th accused in

C.C.No.10/2024 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 418, 420 and 421 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 10 and 24 of the Emigration Act,1983.

3. Heard; Sri. P.A.Mujeeb, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Seetha S. the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the above case has been closed by the above Court invoking Rule 16(1) of the Criminal Rules of

Practice. Therefore, the present application is unwarranted. The said submission is recorded. In the light of the above submission, the application is closed. SD/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rmm/3/6/2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial