Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Jaimes Joseph vs Joseph Thomas

Jaimes Joseph vs Joseph Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1325168

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/552/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jaimes Joseph

Respondent

Joseph Thomas

Excerpt

.....represented by its secretary, madapally p.o., madappally village, kottayam, pin - 686 546. 9 the secretary madappally grama panchayath, madapally p.o., madappally village, kottayam, pin - 686 546. 10 the geologist department of mining and geology, office of the department of mining and geology, kottayam, kottayam, pin - 686 001. :3: by advs s.gopinanthan, senior government pleader, for r6,r7 and r10 adhil p., standing counsel for r8 and r9 ajith murali, for r1 to r5 this review petition having come up for admission on 31.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: :4:orderdated this the 31st day of may, 2024 third parties are in review. the review petitioners submit that the judgment in w.p.(c) no.15641 of 2024 was obtained suppressing material facts relating to the pendency of other litigations and stop memo.2. going through the pleadings, i find that thelimited relief granted by this court in the judgment in w.p.(c) no.15641 of 2024 was directing the 4th respondent in the writ petition to consider ext.p4 application for removing the red earth within a period of three weeks.3. counsel appearing for the writ petitioners submits that the said application was considered and rejected.4. in view of the above facts, i do not find anyerror apparent on the face of the records warranting :5: review of the judgment dated 23.04.2024 in w.p.(c) no.15641 of 2024. therefore, the review petition is dismissed. sd/- n. nagaresh judge amr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946 RP NO. 552 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.04.2024 IN WP(C) NO.15641 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/THIRD PARTY: 1 JAIMES JOSEPH AGED 55 YEARS, PULLICKASHERRY HOUSE, 2 JOB M.D AGED 63 YEARS, MURIYANKAVANUNKAL HOUSE 3 BINU CHERIYAN AGED 47 YEARS, ANJALIMOOTTIL HOUSE 4 MATHEW C PALLATHUMADOM AGED 66 YEARS, MANAGER, MOTHER THERESA MEMORIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL (CBSE) MAMOODU P.O., MADAPPALLY, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 536. BY ADVS. THOMAS JACOB G.ANANTHANARAYANAN RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 JOSEPH THOMAS AGED 72 YEARS, S/O THOMAS KALATHIL HOUSE, KURUMPANADOM P.O, MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 536. :2: 2 FR. ANTONY S/O THOMAS KALATHIL HOUSE, KURUMPANADOM P.O, 3 KUNJOONJAMMA CHACKO 4 JESSI MATHEW 5 JAYAMMA BASIL 6 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DISTRICT COLLECTORATE OFFICE, KOTTAYAM, DISTRICT, PIN - 686 001. 7 THE VILLAGE OFFICER MADAPPALLY VILLAGE OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 546.

8 MADAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT MADAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MADAPALLY P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 546. 9 THE SECRETARY MADAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MADAPALLY P.O., MADAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 546. 10 THE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 001. :3: BY ADVS S.GOPINANTHAN, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, FOR R6,R7 AND R10 ADHIL P., STANDING COUNSEL FOR R8 AND R9 AJITH MURALI, FOR R1 TO R5 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :4:

ORDER

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024 Third parties are in review. The review petitioners submit that the judgment in W.P.(C) No.15641 of 2024 was obtained suppressing material facts relating to the pendency of other litigations and stop memo.

2. Going through the pleadings, I find that the

limited relief granted by this Court in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.15641 of 2024 was directing the 4th respondent in the writ petition to consider Ext.P4 application for removing the red earth within a period of three weeks.

3. Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners submits that the said application was considered and rejected.

4. In view of the above facts, I do not find any

error apparent on the face of the records warranting :5: review of the judgment dated 23.04.2024 in W.P.(C) No.15641 of 2024. Therefore, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE AMR

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2024 Same Parties Jaimes Joseph vs Joseph Thomas Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales