Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajeev.K.K., vs State Bank of India,(Erst While Sbt) ,

Rajeev.K.K., vs State Bank of India,(Erst While Sbt) ,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 03, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1324973

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA/641/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajeev.K.K.,

Respondent

State Bank of India,(Erst While Sbt) ,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mr. justice easwaran s. friday, the 3rd day of may 2024 / 13th vaisakha, 1946 against the judgment dated 27.07.2023 in wp(c) no.22082 of 2023 of high court of kerala appellant/writ petitioner: rajeev.k.k., aged 52 years s/o. kuttappan, kaimariyel, pious mount, monipally, uzhavoor, kottayam, pin - 686636 by adv e.v.moly respondent/respondent: state bank of india,(erst while sbt) , uzhavoor branch, meenachil taluk, kottayam district - represented by authorized officer, pin - 686636 adv. k.jayesh mohankumar for sbi this writ appeal having come up for admission on 03.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdevan ramachandran.j after arguing this matter for some time, the learned counsel for the appellant - smt.e.v.moly, submitted that her client is willing to move the learned single bench itself for necessary orders, including by way of a review or application for extension of time.2. sri.k.jayesh mohankumar - learnedstanding counsel for the bank, did not oppose the afore submissions of smt.e.v.moly; however, pleading that this court make no declarations on the entitlement of the appellant to any relief, even if he is to invoke such. in the afore circumstances, we close this writ appeal, without entering into the merits of any of the rival contentions and leaving them all open; however, with liberty being reserved to the appellant to move the learned single bench in any manner that he may feel appropriate, subject to his entitlement in law. devan ramachandran easwaran s. sas appendix of wa 641/2024 petitioner’s annexures: annexure 1 true copy of the notice dated 19.01.2024 served on the applicant. annexure 2 true copy of the loan account statement and receipt showing the details of the payment made by the applicant.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 13TH VAISAKHA, 1946 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.07.2023 IN WP(C) NO.22082 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER: RAJEEV.K.K., AGED 52 YEARS S/O. KUTTAPPAN, KAIMARIYEL, PIOUS MOUNT, MONIPALLY, UZHAVOOR, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686636 BY ADV E.V.MOLY RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: STATE BANK OF INDIA,(ERST WHILE SBT) , UZHAVOOR BRANCH, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN - 686636 ADV. K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR FOR SBI THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN.J After arguing this matter for some time, the learned counsel for the appellant - Smt.E.V.Moly, submitted that her client is willing to move the learned Single Bench itself for necessary orders, including by way of a review or application for extension of time.

2. Sri.K.Jayesh Mohankumar - learned

Standing Counsel for the Bank, did not oppose the afore submissions of Smt.E.V.Moly; however, pleading that this Court make no declarations on the entitlement of the appellant to any relief, even if he is to invoke such. In the afore circumstances, we close this writ appeal, without entering into the merits of any of the rival contentions and leaving them all open; however, with liberty being reserved to the appellant to move the learned Single Bench in any manner that he may feel appropriate, subject to his entitlement in law. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN EASWARAN S. SAS APPENDIX OF WA 641/2024 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES: Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19.01.2024 SERVED ON THE APPLICANT. Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE LOAN ACCOUNT STATEMENT AND RECEIPT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF THE PAYMENT MADE BY THE APPLICANT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial