Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hareesh vs State of Kerala

Hareesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 25, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1324013

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/3644/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hareesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice c.s. sudha thursday, the 25th day of april 2024 / 5th vaisakha, 1946 crl.mc no. 3644 of 2024 crime no.245/2024 of mulavukad police station, ernakulam petitioner: hareesh aged 33 years s/o haridas, vettezhuthu house, palluruthy, rameswaram village, ernakulam., pin - by adv megha biju respondents: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 abhirami. s aged 24 years d/o p. sasidharan nair, lalitha vilasam, tc 19/2031, poojappura, mudavanmugal, trivandrum- 695012, pin - 695012 3 navaneeth. n. nath aged 30 years s/o narendranath, suryagayathri house, kaninad, vadavucode, puthencruz, trivandrum., pin - 695012 sri. noushad k a- sr gp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 25.04.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 25th day of april 2024 this is an application for quashing annexure a fir alleging commission of offences under sections 354(a)(1)(i), 354, 323, 324, 294(b) and 506 of ipc. matter has been settled with the aggrieved persons herein. annexures b and c are the affidavits sworn to by the informant as well as the aggrieved witness.2. learned public prosecutor also submits thatverification has been done and the settlement is genuine one. in the said circumstances, no purpose would be served by proceeding with the matter and conducting the trial which would just be an abuse of the process of court and waste of time. hence annexure a fir stands quashed. this crl.m.c. is disposed of as above. sd/- c.s.sudha judge ssk/25/04 appendix of crl.mc 3644/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a the certified copy of the fir no. 245/2024 and fisof mulavukad police station, ernakulam annexure b a true copy of the affidavit sworn in by the 2nd annexure c a true copy of the affidavit sworn in by the 3rd respondent's exhibits:nil ssk //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 5TH VAISAKHA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 3644 OF 2024 CRIME NO.245/2024 OF Mulavukad Police Station, Ernakulam PETITIONER: HAREESH AGED 33 YEARS S/O HARIDAS, VETTEZHUTHU HOUSE, PALLURUTHY, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM., PIN - BY ADV MEGHA BIJU RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 ABHIRAMI. S AGED 24 YEARS D/O P. SASIDHARAN NAIR, LALITHA VILASAM, TC 19/2031, POOJAPPURA, MUDAVANMUGAL, TRIVANDRUM- 695012, PIN - 695012 3 NAVANEETH. N. NATH AGED 30 YEARS S/O NARENDRANATH, SURYAGAYATHRI HOUSE, KANINAD, VADAVUCODE, PUTHENCRUZ, TRIVANDRUM., PIN - 695012 SRI. NOUSHAD K A- SR GP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 25th day of April 2024 This is an application for quashing Annexure A FIR alleging commission of offences under Sections 354(A)(1)(i), 354, 323, 324, 294(b) and 506 of IPC. Matter has been settled with the aggrieved persons herein. Annexures B and C are the affidavits sworn to by the informant as well as the aggrieved witness.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor also submits that

verification has been done and the settlement is genuine one. In the said circumstances, no purpose would be served by proceeding with the matter and conducting the trial which would just be an abuse of the process of Court and waste of time. Hence Annexure A FIR stands quashed. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. Sd/- C.S.SUDHA JUDGE SSK/25/04 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3644/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR NO. 245/2024 AND FIS

OF MULAVUKAD POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM Annexure B A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE 2ND Annexure C A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial