Anoop P vs Ramachandran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 06, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1322136

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1322136
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
Decided On: Jun 06, 2024
Case Number: RPFC/116/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anoop P

Respondent

Ramachandran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday, the 6th day of june 2024 / 16th jyaishta, 1946 against the order dated 27.11.2023 in mc no.495 of 2022 of family court, malappuram revision petitioner/respondent: anoop p, aged 33 years, s/o. ramachandran, pulikkal house, paravakkal, puzhakkattiri village, kandungapuram p.o., perinthalmanna taluk, malappuram district, pin - 676321 by advs. nineep k. c.mohammed musthafa d.arun bose respondent/petitioner: ramachandran aged 63 years s/o. velu, pulikkal house, pattarkadav p.o., panakkad, eranad taluk, malappuram district, pin - 676519 this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 06.06.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe son came up against the father, aggrieved by the order of maintenance at the rate of rs.5000/-. it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the father never looked after the affairs of the petitioner or his mother at any point of time. as such, he is not bound to maintain his father. the very submission cannot be sustained. there is no other reason to interfere with the order of maintenance. it is the bare minimum required for maintaining the father. the r.p(f.c.) fails, and is dismissed. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 16TH JYAISHTA, 1946 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2023 IN MC NO.495 OF 2022 OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ANOOP P, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, PULIKKAL HOUSE, PARAVAKKAL, PUZHAKKATTIRI VILLAGE, KANDUNGAPURAM P.O., PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676321 BY ADVS. NINEEP K. C.MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA D.ARUN BOSE RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: RAMACHANDRAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O. VELU, PULIKKAL HOUSE, PATTARKADAV P.O., PANAKKAD, ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676519 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The son came up against the father, aggrieved by the order of maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/-. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the father never looked after the affairs of the petitioner or his mother at any point of time. As such, he is not bound to maintain his father. The very submission cannot be sustained. There is no other reason to interfere with the order of maintenance. It is the bare minimum required for maintaining the father. The R.P(F.C.) fails, and is dismissed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Anoop P vs Ramachandran Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan