Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Arishkumar vs Travancore Devaswom Board

P.Arishkumar vs Travancore Devaswom Board

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 30, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1321206

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA/483/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Arishkumar

Respondent

Travancore Devaswom Board

Excerpt

w.a. no.483 of 2024 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mr. justice easwaran s. tuesday, the 30th day of april 2024 / 10th vaisakha, 1946 wa no. 483 of 2024 against the judgment dated 21.02.2024 in wp(c) no.827 of 2024 of high court of kerala appellant/s: p.arishkumar aged 46 years s/o.damodara panicker, residing at puthenpurakkal house, kadappattoor p.o, pala, kottayam district, pin-686 575, watcher (under suspension), kalluvattom devaswom, ramapuram sub group, ettumanoor group, travancore devaswom board, p.o.melukavu, kottayam district, pin - 686652 by advs. p.u.shailajan nidheesh t.p respondent/s: 1 travancore devaswom board represented by its secretary, nanthancode, kawdiar p.o, 2 devaswom commissioner travancore devaswom board, nanthancode, kawdiar p.o, sc g.biju this writ appeal having come up for admission on 30.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.a. no.483 of 2024 2 devan ramachandran & easwaran s. , jj. ------------------------------------ w.a. no.483 of 2024 ----------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of april 2024judgmentdevan ramachandran, j.the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, during the pendency of this matter, another order has been issued by the government; and therefore, that his client intends to challenge the same. he requested that the writ appeal be permitted to be withdrawn; with the afore-requested liberty being reserved. in the above circumstances, the writ appeal is dismissed; with the liberty as aforestated being fully made available to the petitioner, subject to law. devan ramachandran , judge ns easwaran s., judge

Full Judgment

W.A. No.483 of 2024 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 10TH VAISAKHA, 1946 WA NO. 483 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.02.2024 IN WP(C) NO.827 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/S: P.ARISHKUMAR AGED 46 YEARS S/O.DAMODARA PANICKER, RESIDING AT PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, KADAPPATTOOR P.O, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 575, WATCHER (UNDER SUSPENSION), KALLUVATTOM DEVASWOM, RAMAPURAM SUB GROUP, ETTUMANOOR GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, P.O.MELUKAVU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686652 BY ADVS. P.U.SHAILAJAN NIDHEESH T.P RESPONDENT/S: 1 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR P.O, 2 DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, KAWDIAR P.O, SC G.BIJU THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A. No.483 of 2024 2 DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & EASWARAN S. , JJ. ------------------------------------ W.A. No.483 of 2024 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of April 2024

JUDGMENT

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, during the pendency of this matter, another order has been issued by the Government; and therefore, that his client intends to challenge the same. He requested that the Writ Appeal be permitted to be withdrawn; with the afore-requested liberty being reserved. In the above circumstances, the Writ Appeal is dismissed; with the liberty as aforestated being fully made available to the petitioner, subject to law. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN , JUDGE NS EASWARAN S., JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial