Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nagarathna a vs State of Kerala

Nagarathna a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 30, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1321034

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(Crl.)/352/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nagarathna a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mr. justice easwaran s. tuesday, the 30th day of april 2024 / 10th vaisakha, 1946 petitioner: nagarathna a., aged 54 years w/o sivananda shetty k, ramadas, santhi adukka, kasargod, pin - 671121 m.h.hanis p.m.jinimol t.n.lekshmi shankar nancy mol p. anandhu p.c. neethu.g.nadh ciya e.j. respondents:1 state of kerala, represented by the additional chief secretary to government, home and vigilance department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695001 2 the district collector & district magistrate civil station,vidyanagar,kasargod - 671123 3 the district police chief vidyanagar-uliyathadka road,kudlu,kasargod - 671123 4 the chairman, advisory board, kaapa, sreenivas, padam road, vivekananda nagar, elamakkara,ernakulam dist, pin - 6820265 the superintendent of jail central jail, viyyur, pin - 670004 sr.pp. - sri.unnikrishna kaimal this writ petition (criminal) having come up for admission on 30.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdevan ramachandran, j.sri.m.h.hanis - learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that his client is not pressing this writ petition because, pending this matter, the detenue has already been released on a bond, as per the orders of the government. he, therefore, sought liberty for his client to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to approach this court again, if so required in future. in the afore circumstances, this writ petition is closed as having been withdrawn; with the afore requested liberty being reserved in favour of the petitioner; for which purpose, all rival contentions are also left undecided. sd/- devan ramachandran sd/- easwaran s. stu

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 10TH VAISAKHA, 1946 PETITIONER: NAGARATHNA A., AGED 54 YEARS W/O SIVANANDA SHETTY K, RAMADAS, SANTHI ADUKKA, KASARGOD, PIN - 671121 M.H.HANIS P.M.JINIMOL T.N.LEKSHMI SHANKAR NANCY MOL P. ANANDHU P.C. NEETHU.G.NADH CIYA E.J. RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME AND VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CIVIL STATION,VIDYANAGAR,KASARGOD - 671123 3 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF VIDYANAGAR-ULIYATHADKA ROAD,KUDLU,KASARGOD - 671123 4 THE CHAIRMAN, ADVISORY BOARD, KAAPA, SREENIVAS, PADAM ROAD, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA,ERNAKULAM DIST, PIN - 682026

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAIL CENTRAL JAIL, VIYYUR, PIN - 670004 SR.PP. - SRI.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

Sri.M.H.Hanis - learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that his client is not pressing this writ petition because, pending this matter, the detenue has already been released on a bond, as per the orders of the Government. He, therefore, sought liberty for his client to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to approach this Court again, if so required in future. In the afore circumstances, this writ petition is closed as having been withdrawn; with the afore requested liberty being reserved in favour of the petitioner; for which purpose, all rival contentions are also left undecided. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Sd/- EASWARAN S. stu

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial