Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnakumar B vs R. Muthukumar,

Krishnakumar B vs R. Muthukumar,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1320151

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/862/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnakumar B

Respondent

R. Muthukumar,

Excerpt

.....g. venugopal (father's name and age not known to the petitioner) assistant engineer, office of the assistant engineer, electrical section, pettah pattoor, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695035 sri.k.v. manojkumar-r1 sri.a. arunkumar-r2 this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 31.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of may, 2024 the petitioners have approached this court subsequently with w.p.(c) no.14142/2024. the said writ petition stands allowed with a direction to the respondents to shift the transformer to a safer location.2. in view of the subsequent developments, i am of theview that this contempt of court case need not be further prosecuted for the time being. recording the afore facts, the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- n.nagaresh judge spk appendix of con.case(c) 862/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment in wp(c) no.467 of 2024 of this court dated 22/1/2024 annexure a2 a true photographs showing red marking on the compound wall adjacent to the petitioners house annexure a3 a true copy of the covering letter communicated to the respondent by registered post dated 30/1/2024annexure a4 the postal receipt of annexure a3 annexure a5 a true copy of the order dated annexure a6 true photographs of the explosion on annexure a7 a true copy of the reply message issueto the petitioner

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 862 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.467 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER: 1 KRISHNAKUMAR B AGED 57 YEARS S/O. BHARGAVAN, RESIDING AT TC 93/310, 'KRISHNA' ANAYARA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029 2 SMITHA KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 49 YEARS W/O. KRISHNAKUMAR, RESIDING AT TC 93/310, 'KRISHNA' ANAYARA POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695029 BY ADV K.C.ELDHO RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 OT 4 1 R. MUTHUKUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR STADIUM ROAD, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 2 GEETHA M. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., (KSEB) POWER HOUSE BUILDING, POWER HOUSE ROAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695036 3 G. VENUGOPAL (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PETTAH PATTOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695035 SRI.K.V. MANOJKUMAR-R1 SRI.A. ARUNKUMAR-R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2024 The petitioners have approached this Court subsequently with W.P.(C) No.14142/2024. The said writ petition stands allowed with a direction to the respondents to shift the transformer to a safer location.

2. In view of the subsequent developments, I am of the

view that this Contempt of Court Case need not be further prosecuted for the time being. Recording the afore facts, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 862/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.467 OF 2024 OF THIS COURT DATED 22/1/2024 Annexure A2 A TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING RED MARKING ON THE COMPOUND WALL ADJACENT TO THE PETITIONERS HOUSE Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER COMMUNICATED TO THE RESPONDENT BY REGISTERED POST DATED 30/1/2024

Annexure A4         THE POSTAL RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE A3
Annexure A5         A   TRUE  COPY    OF   THE   ORDER   DATED
Annexure A6         TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXPLOSION ON
Annexure A7         A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY MESSAGE ISSUE

TO THE PETITIONER

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial