Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shareef vs State of Kerala

Shareef vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 12, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1320039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/2987/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shareef

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....abdul majeed, residing at suneera manzil, eyyala, bandichal, thekkil p.o., kasaragod district, pin - 671541 by adv thomas john p. pp - m p prasanth this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 12.04.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 12th day of april, 2024 this criminal miscellaneous case has been filed by the petitioner under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to magistrate court-ii, hosdurg.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant and the learned public prosecutor.3. in this matter, prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under sections 354, 354a(1)(i) and 354d of the ipc.4. it is submitted that the matter has been amicably settled and the defacto complainant filed affidavit in this regard.5. the learned public prosecutor conceded the settlement and recording of statement, in this regard.6. since the matter has been amicably settledbetween the parties, there is no reason to disallow the prayer for quashment. therefore, in the interest of justice, i am inclined to allow this petition. in the result, this criminal miscellaneous case stands allowed and all further proceedings pursuant to magistrate court-ii, hosdurg, stand quashed. sd/- a. badharudeen judge sk appendix of crl.mc 2987/2024petitioner annexures : annexure-a1 the certified copy of the fir dated annexure-a2 the certified copy of the final report dated 27/1/2022 in crime no.160/2021 of annexure-a3 the affidavit dated 13/2/2024 sworn in by the third respondent respondents’ annexures : nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 2987 OF 2024 CRIME NO.160/2021 OF VANITHA POLICE STATION, KASARGODE IN CC NO.313 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, HOSDRUG PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SHAREEF AGED 47 YEARS S/O. PULUNTHOTTI MOIDU, RESIDING AT KALANAD JUMA MASJID CROSS ROAD, KALANAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671317 BY ADVS. T.MADHU C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KASARAGOD VANITHA POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671317 3 SHANA SUHAIL AGED 30 YEARS D/O. ABDUL MAJEED, RESIDING AT SUNEERA MANZIL, EYYALA, BANDICHAL, THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671541 BY ADV THOMAS JOHN P. PP - M P PRASANTH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 12th day of April, 2024 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to Magistrate Court-II, Hosdurg.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. In this matter, prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 354, 354A(1)(i) and 354D of the IPC.

4. It is submitted that the matter has been amicably settled and the defacto complainant filed affidavit in this regard.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor conceded the settlement and recording of statement, in this regard.

6. Since the matter has been amicably settled

between the parties, there is no reason to disallow the prayer for quashment. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I am inclined to allow this petition. In the result, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case stands allowed and all further proceedings pursuant to Magistrate Court-II, Hosdurg, stand quashed. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE SK APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2987/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES : Annexure-A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR DATED Annexure-A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 27/1/2022 IN CRIME NO.160/2021 OF Annexure-A3 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 13/2/2024 SWORN IN BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES : NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial