Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rameesha vs State of Kerala

Rameesha vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1319598

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rev.Pet/344/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rameesha

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....revision petition having come up for admission on 26.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:ordera jcb was employed by the accused so as to grab a certain portion of the property owned by the municipality by excavation. the adjoining soil was removed by grabbing a portion of the property owned by the municipality and that has resulted in collapse of the compound wall. it is submitted that there exists a civil dispute as to the boundary between the property belonging to the accused and the municipality. it is the accused who employed the jcb for the purpose of removing the soil and demolishing the adjoining compound wall. the application submitted for release of the vehicle under section 457 cr.p.c. was not properly considered by the magistrate court. in fact, the custody of the said vehicle is not at all necessary to proceed further with the investigation. as such, it can be released on proper kychit. it can be released on executing sufficient security, for that purpose, the matter is remanded back to the magistrate court concerned. the parties shall appear before the magistrate court on shall be decided and determined by the magistrate concerned. the criminal revision petition will stand disposed of accordingly. sd/- p.somarajan judge msp appendix of crl.rev.pet 344/2024 petitioner annexures annexure 1 a true copy of the sketch prepared and certificate issued by the village officer kattipparuthi dated 06.03.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946 CRIME NO.1361/2023 OF VALANCHERY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.01.2024 IN CMP NO.127 OF 2024 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, TIRUR REVISION PETITIONER/CLAIM PETITIONER: RAMEESHA, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O. MUJEEB, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOVATHUMTHARA, EDAYOOR, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676552 BY ADVS. K.SUJAI SATHIAN PREETHI. P.V. M.V.BALAGOPAL AISWARYA S. ASHOKAN SREELEKHA. P RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 PP SRI SANGEETHARAJ N.R THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

A JCB was employed by the accused so as to grab a certain portion of the property owned by the Municipality by excavation. The adjoining soil was removed by grabbing a portion of the property owned by the Municipality and that has resulted in collapse of the compound wall. It is submitted that there exists a civil dispute as to the boundary between the property belonging to the accused and the Municipality. It is the accused who employed the JCB for the purpose of removing the soil and demolishing the adjoining compound wall. The application submitted for release of the vehicle under Section 457 Cr.P.C. was not properly considered by the Magistrate Court. In fact, the custody of the said vehicle is not at all necessary to proceed further with the investigation. As such, it can be released on proper Kychit. It can be released on executing sufficient security, for that purpose, the matter is remanded back to the Magistrate Court concerned. The parties shall appear before the Magistrate Court on shall be decided and determined by the Magistrate concerned. The Criminal Revision Petition will stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE msp APPENDIX OF CRL.REV.PET 344/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH PREPARED AND CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER KATTIPPARUTHI DATED 06.03.2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial