Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jose Mathew vs State of Kerala

Jose Mathew vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 03, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1318960

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2492/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jose Mathew

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 3rd day of april 2024 / 14th chaithra, 1946 bail appl. no. 2492 of 2024 crime no.0/0 of erattupettah police station, kottayam petitioner: 1 jose mathew s/o mathew, thyparambil (h), ottalloor p.o., 2 beena jose w/o jose mathew, thyparambil (h), ottalloor p.o., by adv godwin joseph respondent: state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, through the station house officer, kanjikuzhy police station, idukki district, pin - 682031other present: sr public prosecutor smt seetha s this bail application having come up for admission on 03.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 3rd day of april, 2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioners apprehend arrest in an unknown crime by the erattupettah station, kottayam for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.3. heard; sri. godwin joseph, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and smt. seetha s., the learned senior public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions,submitted that as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioners by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. the said submission is recorded. in the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. it is made clear that, if the -:3:- presence of the petitioners is required by erattupettah police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, they shall be issued with a notice under section 41a of the code, if the offence alleged against them is punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias,judge rmm/3/4/2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 2492 OF 2024 CRIME NO.0/0 OF ERATTUPETTAH POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM PETITIONER: 1 JOSE MATHEW S/O MATHEW, THYPARAMBIL (H), OTTALLOOR P.O., 2 BEENA JOSE W/O JOSE MATHEW, THYPARAMBIL (H), OTTALLOOR P.O., BY ADV GODWIN JOSEPH RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KANJIKUZHY POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 682031

OTHER PRESENT: SR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT SEETHA S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in an unknown crime by the Erattupettah Station, Kottayam for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri. Godwin Joseph, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Smt. Seetha S., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submitted that as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioners by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. The said submission is recorded. In the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. It is made clear that, if the -:3:- presence of the petitioners is required by Erattupettah police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, they shall be issued with a notice under Section 41A of the Code, if the offence alleged against them is punishable for less than seven years. SD/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE rmm/3/4/2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial