Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayan vs Sheeja

JAYAN vs Sheeja

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 23, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1318268

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/198/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JAYAN

Respondent

Sheeja

Excerpt

.....no.198 of 2024 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 23rd day of april 2023judgmentv.g.arun,j.this original petition is filed challenging ext.p4 order by which the family court has issued certain directions regarding the interim custody of the minor child of the first petitioner and respondent. the main grievance is with respect to the direction to grant interim custody of the child to the mother for one month during summer vacation.2. we heard the learned counsel on either side at length andinteracted with the child. based on such interaction, we find that, for the time being, interim custody of the child can be granted to the respondent from 27/04/2024 to 07/05/2024. we are limiting the custody upto before the family court on 07/05/2024. we direct the family court to take a decision regarding the future custody of the child during the balance period of the summer vacation. for this purpose, the learned judge of the family court may interact with the child on 07/05/2024 op(fc) no.198 of 2024 4 and take a decision keeping in mind the welfare and the wish of the child. the original petition is disposed of as above. sd/- v.g. arun, judge sd/- s.manu, judge dpk op(fc) no.198 of 2024 5 appendix of op (fc) 198/2024 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of o.p. no.484/2023 filed by the respondent herein before the family court, ottapalam exhibit p2 true copy of i.a. no. 1/2023 in o.p. no.484/2023 filed by the respondent herein before the family court, ottapalam exhibit p3 counter statement filed by the petitioners herein in i.a. no. 1/2023 in o.p. no.484/2023 before the family court, ottapalam exhibit p4 true copy of the order dated 22.12.2023 in i.a. no. ottapalam

Full Judgment

OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 3RD VAISAKHA, 1946 OP (FC) NO. 198 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO.484 OF 2023 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM PETITIONERS: 1 JAYAN AGED 49 YEARS S/O. KUNJAN RESIDING AT PUTHANKULAM VEEDU, THIRUVAZHIYODE P.O. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY JANAKI W/O KUNJAN, AGED 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT PUTHANKULAM VEEDU, THIRUVAZHIYODE P.O. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679514 2 JANAKI AGED 73 YEARS W/O KUNJAN, RESIDING AT PUTHANKULAM VEEDU, THIRUVAZHIYODE P.O. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679514 BY ADVS. T.K.SANDEEP SWETHA R. RESPONDENTS: SHEEJA D/O.SREEDHARAN, AGED 35 YEARS, PUNNAMPALLIYALIL VEEDU, POOKKOTTUKAVU P.O. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679514 BY ADVS. JAYARAJ M LATHEEF P.K.(K/1290/2020) OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 2 THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 3

V.G. ARUN, J.

& S.MANU, J =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of April 2023

JUDGMENT

V.G.ARUN,J.

This original petition is filed challenging Ext.P4 order by which the Family Court has issued certain directions regarding the interim custody of the minor child of the first petitioner and respondent. The main grievance is with respect to the direction to grant interim custody of the child to the mother for one month during summer vacation.

2. We heard the learned Counsel on either side at length and

interacted with the child. Based on such interaction, we find that, for the time being, interim custody of the child can be granted to the respondent from 27/04/2024 to 07/05/2024. We are limiting the custody upto before the Family Court on 07/05/2024. We direct the Family court to take a decision regarding the future custody of the child during the balance period of the summer vacation. For this purpose, the learned Judge of the Family Court may interact with the child on 07/05/2024 OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 4 and take a decision keeping in mind the welfare and the wish of the child. The original petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- V.G. ARUN, Judge Sd/- S.MANU, Judge dpk OP(FC) No.198 of 2024 5 APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 198/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF O.P. NO.484/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 1/2023 IN O.P. NO.484/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM Exhibit P3 COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IN I.A. NO. 1/2023 IN O.P. NO.484/2023 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, OTTAPALAM Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.12.2023 IN I.A. NO. OTTAPALAM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial