Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Robert vs State of Kerala

Robert vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 20, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1317843

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(Crl.)/250/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robert

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice bechu kurian thomas wednesday, the 20th day of march 2024 / 30th phalguna, 1945 op(crl.) no. 250 of 2024 crime no.72/2009 of kadinamkulam police station, against the order/judgment dated in cc no.1123 of 2019 of judicial magistrate of first class -i,attingal petitioner/s: robert aged 25 years s/o tony, thaivillakam veedu, puthenkurichi desom, kadinamkulam, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 69530 by adv m.r.sarin respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 the station house officer kadinamkulam police station, thiruvananthapuram, kerala, pin - 69530 other present: smt. sreeja v. (pp) this op (criminal) having come up for admission on 20.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:bechu kurian thomas, j.=========================== ------------------------------------------------ dated this the 20th day of march 2024judgmentpetitioner seeks for a direction for speedy disposal of2. the supreme court has, time and again observed that theconstitutional courts must refrain itself from issuing directions for time bound disposal of the matters pending before the trial courts. grant of an out of turn priority to a particular case will interfere with the priority of other cases, and therefore, it would be arbitrary for this court to issue such directions. however, it is always open to a party in a proceeding to request the court concerned to grant priority, and if the circumstances so warrant, the court will be entitled to grant such a priority.3. therefore, in the circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to issue any direction for speedy disposal of4. however, if any request for an out of turn priority is soughtfor by the petitioner, the learned magistrate will be at liberty to consider granting such priority, notwithstanding the disinclination of this court to issue any direction in that regard. with the above observations,.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1945 OP(CRL.) NO. 250 OF 2024 CRIME NO.72/2009 OF Kadinamkulam Police Station, AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1123 OF 2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,ATTINGAL PETITIONER/S: ROBERT AGED 25 YEARS S/O TONY, THAIVILLAKAM VEEDU, PUTHENKURICHI DESOM, KADINAMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 69530 BY ADV M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KADINAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 69530 OTHER PRESENT: SMT. SREEJA V. (PP) THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

=========================== ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of March 2024

JUDGMENT

Petitioner seeks for a direction for speedy disposal of

2. The Supreme Court has, time and again observed that the

Constitutional courts must refrain itself from issuing directions for time bound disposal of the matters pending before the Trial Courts. Grant of an out of turn priority to a particular case will interfere with the priority of other cases, and therefore, it would be arbitrary for this Court to issue such directions. However, it is always open to a party in a proceeding to request the court concerned to grant priority, and if the circumstances so warrant, the court will be entitled to grant such a priority.

3. Therefore, in the circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to issue any direction for speedy disposal of

4. However, if any request for an out of turn priority is sought

for by the petitioner, the learned Magistrate will be at liberty to consider granting such priority, notwithstanding the disinclination of this Court to issue any direction in that regard. With the above observations, this original petition is dismissed. sd/ BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jm/ APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 250/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT AS CC NO MAGISTRATE COURT I, ATTINGAL, IN CRIME NO Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE E COURTS PROCEEDINGS IN

CC NO 1123/2019 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST- CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I, ATTINGAL IN CRIME NO 72/2009 OF KADINAMKULAM POLICE STATION,

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial