Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pradeep Kumar Pulukool vs State of Kerala

Pradeep Kumar Pulukool vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1316865

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2207/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep Kumar Pulukool

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 26th day of march 2024 / 6th chaithra, 1946 petitioner/s: pradeep kumar pulukool aged 48 years s/o.ambu mundayil ,pulukool house ,kattachery karivellur ,kannur district, pin - 670521 by adv m.baiju noel respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 the station house officer palakkad south police station palakkad district, pin - other present: sr pp smt neema t v this bail application having come up for admission on 26.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner is apprehending arrest by the town south police, palakkad in an unknown crime for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.3. heard; sri.m.baiju noel, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt.neema t.v., the learned senior public prosecutor.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioner as alleged in the bail application. in the light of the above submission, the bailapplication is closed. it is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by the town south police, palakkad with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under section 41a of the code, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rkc/26.03.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: PRADEEP KUMAR PULUKOOL AGED 48 YEARS S/O.AMBU MUNDAYIL ,PULUKOOL HOUSE ,KATTACHERY KARIVELLUR ,KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670521 BY ADV M.BAIJU NOEL RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PALAKKAD SOUTH POLICE STATION PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: sr pp smt neema t v THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest by the Town South Police, Palakkad in an unknown crime for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri.M.Baiju Noel, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioner as alleged in the bail application. In the light of the above submission, the bail

application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by the Town South Police, Palakkad with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under Section 41A of the Code, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE Rkc/26.03.2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial