Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prasanth vs Rajeevan

Prasanth vs Rajeevan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 18, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1315531

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/3180/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prasanth

Respondent

Rajeevan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen thursday, the 18th day of july 2024 / 27th ashadha, 1946 against the order dated 05.10.2018 in i.a.no.598/2018, i.a.no.599/2018, ia no.600/2018 and ia no.601/2018 in os no.334 of 2013 of munsiff court, kodungallur petitioner/defendant: prasanth aged 27 years s/o.thriprayatt preman, madavana desom, eriyad village, kodungallur taluk, rep. by power of attorney holder, umesh, aged 36, s/o.tharayil unnikrishnan, kalpaka road desom, lokamaleswaram village, kodungallur taluk. by adv jeevesh p.v respondent/plaintiff: rajeevan aged 44 years s/o.nelliparambath shanmughan, elathuruthu desom, methala village, kodungallur taluk - 680 669. by advs. sri.k.s.rajesh sri.m.shaju purushothaman this op (civil) having been finally heard on 18.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 18th day of july, 2024 this original petition (civil) has been filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, challenging order dated 05.10.2018 in i.a.nos.598/2018, 599/2018, 600/2018 and court, kodungallur.2. no representation for the petitioner. therefore, this original petition (civil) stands dismissed for non-prosecution. interim stay stands vacated.registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgmentto the munsiff’s court, kodungallur, for information and further steps. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 27TH ASHADHA, 1946 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.10.2018 IN I.A.NO.598/2018, I.A.NO.599/2018, IA NO.600/2018 AND IA NO.601/2018 IN OS NO.334 OF 2013 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR PETITIONER/DEFENDANT: PRASANTH AGED 27 YEARS S/O.THRIPRAYATT PREMAN, MADAVANA DESOM, ERIYAD VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, UMESH, AGED 36, S/O.THARAYIL UNNIKRISHNAN, KALPAKA ROAD DESOM, LOKAMALESWARAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADV Jeevesh P.V RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: RAJEEVAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O.NELLIPARAMBATH SHANMUGHAN, ELATHURUTHU DESOM, METHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK - 680 669. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 18th day of July, 2024 This Original Petition (Civil) has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging order dated 05.10.2018 in I.A.Nos.598/2018, 599/2018, 600/2018 and Court, Kodungallur.

2. No representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this original petition (civil) stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim stay stands vacated.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment

to the Munsiff’s Court, Kodungallur, for information and further steps. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial