Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinodkumar vs Venugopal T

Vinodkumar vs Venugopal T

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1315262

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/2700/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinodkumar

Respondent

Venugopal T

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman thursday, the 1st day of february 2024 / 12th magha, 1945 against the order/judgment wp(c) 5225/2023 of high court of kerala petitioner: vinodkumar aged 48 years s/o krishnankutty, padmalayam, thadikkadav, west veliyathunadu p.o., ernakulam, pin - 683511 by advs. ameer.k.m. k.y.sajeeb fasna t.y rahmathullah.m hazeena beevi n.h asvino sheej.s respondent: venugopal t secretary, karumalloor gramapanchayath, pin - 683511 sri.saigy jacob palatty-sr.gp this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 01.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 1st day of february, 2024 it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been favourably considered and a decision has been taken to carry out the work by including the same in the works to be carried out utilizing the own funds of the panchayat. it is submitted that further steps for repairing the road in pursuance to its being included in the project using the own funds of the panchayat will be taken without delay. the submissions in the affidavit are recorded. this contempt of court case is, accordingly, closed. sd/- anu sivaraman judge np appendix of con.case(c) 2700/2023 petitioner's annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment dated 01.03.2023 passed by this hon'ble court in wp(c) no.5225/2023respondent's exhibits exhibit r-1(a) a true copy of the decision no. 7(1) of the karumaloor grama panchayat on 09.11.2023 exhibit r-1(b) a true copy of the decision no. 1(1) of the committee of the karumaloor grama panchayatheld on 25.01.2024.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 12TH MAGHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 5225/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: VINODKUMAR AGED 48 YEARS S/O KRISHNANKUTTY, PADMALAYAM, THADIKKADAV, WEST VELIYATHUNADU P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683511 BY ADVS. AMEER.K.M. K.Y.SAJEEB FASNA T.Y RAHMATHULLAH.M HAZEENA BEEVI N.H ASVINO SHEEJ.S RESPONDENT: VENUGOPAL T SECRETARY, KARUMALLOOR GRAMAPANCHAYATH, PIN - 683511 SRI.SAIGY JACOB PALATTY-SR.GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of February, 2024 It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been favourably considered and a decision has been taken to carry out the work by including the same in the works to be carried out utilizing the own funds of the Panchayat. It is submitted that further steps for repairing the road in pursuance to its being included in the project using the own funds of the Panchayat will be taken without delay. The submissions in the affidavit are recorded. This contempt of court case is, accordingly, closed. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2700/2023 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.03.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP

(C) NO.5225/2023

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS Exhibit R-1(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION NO. 7(1) OF THE KARUMALOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT ON 09.11.2023 Exhibit R-1(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION NO. 1(1) OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE KARUMALOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT

HELD ON 25.01.2024.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial