Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Basil Nattar vs Rani George

Basil Nattar vs Rani George

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1315032

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/670/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Basil Nattar

Respondent

Rani George

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. friday, the 31st day of may 2024 / 10th jyaishta, 1946 con.case(c) no. 670 of 2024 against the order/judgment dated in wp(c) no.26648 of 2023 of high court of kerala petitioner/s: basil nattar aged 58 years s/o plomindas m nettar, aged 58, angel villa, moothakara, kollam, pin - 691013 by advs. johnson gomez s.biju (kizhakkanela) sanjay johnson john gomez sanjith johnson arun johny abin jacob mathew deebu r. ann maria sebastian respondent/s: rani george principal secretary, department of education, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695001 this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 31.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, orders have been passed by the respondent in compliance with the annexure-a1 judgment. therefore, this contempt of court case is closed sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge rpk appendix of con.case(c) 670/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a2 a true copy of the written submission submitted by the counsel for the petitioner to the respondent annexure a3 a true copy of the notice no.08/02/2024/1 dated 08/02/2024 submitted by the counsel for the petitioner to the respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 670 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.26648 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: BASIL NATTAR AGED 58 YEARS S/O PLOMINDAS M NETTAR, AGED 58, ANGEL VILLA, MOOTHAKARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691013 BY ADVS. JOHNSON GOMEZ S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) SANJAY JOHNSON JOHN GOMEZ SANJITH JOHNSON ARUN JOHNY ABIN JACOB MATHEW DEEBU R. ANN MARIA SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/S: RANI GEORGE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, orders have been passed by the respondent in compliance with the Annexure-A1 judgment. Therefore, this contempt of Court case is closed Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 670/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.08/02/2024/1 DATED 08/02/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial