Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vignesh. B, vs State of Kerala,

Vignesh. B, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 07, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1313926

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1847/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vignesh. B,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 7th day of august 2024 / 16th sravana, 1946 crime no.36/2023 of trivandrum excise range office, thiruvananthapuram against the order/judgment dated in bail appl. no.9475 of 2023 of high court of kerala petitioner/accused : vignesh. b, aged 23 years s/o balamurugan, t.c no. 39/169, krishna bhavan, kuriyathi, manacaud. p.o, thiruvananthapuram, kerala, pin - 695009by advs. v.s.thoshin satheesh mohanan sreejith s. nair akhil suseendran mahima colin antony dcruz sekhar g. thampi p.mohamed sabah saipooja(k/001130/2016) libin stanley(k/250/2015) sadik ismayil(k/000238/2014) r.gayathri(k/249/2014) m.mahin hamza(k/000113/2017) rayees p.(k/596/2014) alwin joseph(k/001415/2021) benson ambrose(k/000724/2024) respondent: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 sr.public prosecutor smt.pushpalatha m.k. this bail application having come up for admission on 07.08.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: dated this the 7th day of august, 2024orderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdraw the bail application, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the trial court since the complaint has already been filed before the trial court. the said submission is recorded. resultantly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, by reserving the right of the petitioner to move the trial court with a similar application in view of the change of circumstances. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rmm7/8/2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRIME NO.36/2023 OF TRIVANDRUM EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN Bail Appl. NO.9475 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/ACCUSED : VIGNESH. B, AGED 23 YEARS S/O BALAMURUGAN, T.C NO. 39/169, KRISHNA BHAVAN, KURIYATHI, MANACAUD. P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695009

BY ADVS. V.S.THOSHIN SATHEESH MOHANAN SREEJITH S. NAIR AKHIL SUSEENDRAN MAHIMA COLIN ANTONY DCRUZ SEKHAR G. THAMPI P.MOHAMED SABAH SAIPOOJA(K/001130/2016) LIBIN STANLEY(K/250/2015) SADIK ISMAYIL(K/000238/2014) R.GAYATHRI(K/249/2014) M.MAHIN HAMZA(K/000113/2017) RAYEES P.(K/596/2014) ALWIN JOSEPH(K/001415/2021) BENSON AMBROSE(K/000724/2024) RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.PUSHPALATHA M.K. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Dated this the 7th day of August, 2024

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdraw the bail application, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the Trial Court since the complaint has already been filed before the Trial Court. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, by reserving the right of the petitioner to move the Trial Court with a similar application in view of the change of circumstances. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rmm7/8/2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial