Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Leena vs State of Kerala

LEENA vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 15, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1313834

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1830/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

LEENA

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 station house officer pangodu police station, thiruvananthapuram district, pin - 695562 by pp smt shynimol v o this bail application having come up for admission on 15.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 15th day of march,2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner apprehends arrest by the pangodu police station, thiruvananthapuram for allegedly committing the offences under section 380 and 452 of the indian penal code.3. heard; sri. latheesh sebstian, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt. shynimol. v.o., the learned senior public prosecutor appearing for the respondents.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions,submitted that as on today there is no case registered against the petitioner by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. the said submission is recorded. -:3:- in the light of the above submission, the bailapplication is closed. it is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by pangodu police station with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under section 41a of the code, if the offences alleged against him are punishable for less than seven years.sd/- c.s.dias,judge mtk/15.1.2024 -:4:- appendix of bail appl. 1830/2024 petitioner annexures annexure 1 true copy of the marriage certificate issued by the marriage officer of olloor gramma panchayat is dated 01.12.2018 annexure 2 true copy of the marriage invitation of the petitioner's daughter's marriage

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 1830 OF 2024 PETITIONER: LEENA AGED 43 YEARS W/O SATHEESHAN, RENJINI BHAVAN, BLOCK NO. 10, JAWAHARA COLONY, PERINGAMALA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695562 BY ADV LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER PANGODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695562 BY PP SMT SHYNIMOL V O THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 15th day of March,2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest by the Pangodu Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram for allegedly committing the offences under Section 380 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard; Sri. Latheesh Sebstian, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Shynimol. V.O., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submitted that as on today there is no case registered against the petitioner by the said police, as alleged in the bail application. The said submission is recorded. -:3:- In the light of the above submission, the bail

application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by Pangodu police station with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under Section 41A of the Code, if the offences alleged against him are punishable for less than seven years.

Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/15.1.2024 -:4:- APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 1830/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE 1 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MARRIAGE OFFICER OF OLLOOR GRAMMA PANCHAYAT IS DATED 01.12.2018 ANNEXURE 2 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE INVITATION OF THE PETITIONER'S DAUGHTER'S MARRIAGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties LEENA vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales