Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nithya Thomas, vs State of Kerala,

Nithya Thomas, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 29, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1311820

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1586/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nithya Thomas,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias thursday, the 29th day of february 2024 / 10th phalguna, 1945 bail appl. no. 1586 of 2024 crime no.0/0 of infopark police station, ernakulam petitioner/accused: nithya thomas, aged 30 years d/o.thomas.p.j,perukonil house, alattil.p.o., periya, wayanad, pin - 670644 by advs. suman chakravarthy brejitha unnikrishnan sudeesh k.e. respondent/state: state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - other present: sr pp smt neema t v this bail application having come up for admission on 29.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner apprehends arrest by the infopark police station, ernakulam, in an unregistered crime, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.3. heard; sri. suman chakravarthy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt.neema t.v., the learned public prosecutor appearing for the respondent.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioner by the infopark police station, as alleged in the bail application. in the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. it is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by infopark police station with regardto the allegations made in the bail application, she shall be issued with a notice under section 41a of the code, if the offence alleged against her is punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias judge shg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 1586 OF 2024 CRIME NO.0/0 OF INFOPARK POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: NITHYA THOMAS, AGED 30 YEARS D/O.THOMAS.P.J,PERUKONIL HOUSE, ALATTIL.P.O., PERIYA, WAYANAD, PIN - 670644 BY ADVS. SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY BREJITHA UNNIKRISHNAN SUDEESH K.E. RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SMT NEEMA T V THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest by the Infopark Police Station, Ernakulam, in an unregistered crime, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri. Suman Chakravarthy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, as on today there is no crime registered against the petitioner by the Infopark Police Station, as alleged in the bail application. In the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by Infopark police station with regard

to the allegations made in the bail application, she shall be issued with a notice under Section 41A of the Code, if the offence alleged against her is punishable for less than seven years. Sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE shg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial